Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ??

[Bill Case]

Hi;

Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
the = sign) before.  However imaginatively write a yum install command
using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
from yum.

Now what do I do?

By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual?

-- 
Regards Bill

[Kam Leo]

On 4/23/07, William Case <billlinux(a)rogers.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hi;
>
>  Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
>  dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
>  the = sign) before.  However imaginatively write a yum install command
>  using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
>  from yum.
>
>  Now what do I do?
>
>  By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual? 
I show xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 on my system. What repositories do you
have enabled?

>  Regards Bill

[Bill Case]

Hi;

On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 21:07 -0800, Kam Leo wrote:
>  On 4/23/07, William Case <billlinux(a)rogers.com&gt; wrote:
>  > Hi;
>  >
>  > Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
>  > dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
>  > the = sign) before.  However imaginatively write a yum install command
>  > using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
>  > from yum.
>  >
>  > Now what do I do?
>  >
>  > By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual?
>  
>  I show xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 on my system. What repositories do you
>  have enabled? 
Yumex shows upgrades available: xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 and
xine-lib-develop-1.1.6-1.fc6 

When I upgrade I get the following warning:
Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
xine-lib-extras-nonfree

My repos are the standard Fedora: core, updates, extras, and livna.

I have tried the above process with yum from the command line with the
same results.  I have excluded xine in order to get the rest of my
upgrades. I did a yum install for xine-lib-1.1.5 and got no results.

-- 
Regards Bill

[Markku Kolkka]

William Case kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 24. 
huhtikuuta 2007):
>  Yumex shows upgrades available: xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 and
>  xine-lib-develop-1.1.6-1.fc6
>
>  When I upgrade I get the following warning:
>  Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
>  xine-lib-extras-nonfree 
You can't update your xine packages until Livna provides an 
updated build of xine-lib-extras-nonfree that works with 
xine-lib-1.1.6.

>  My repos are the standard Fedora: core, updates, extras, and
>  livna. 
Livna isn't a standard Fedora repo, it's an independent 
third-party repository.

-- 
 Markku Kolkka
 markku.kolkka(a)iki.fi

[Michael Schwendt]

On 24/04/07, Markku Kolkka wrote:
>  William Case kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 24.
>  huhtikuuta 2007):
>  > Yumex shows upgrades available: xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 and
>  > xine-lib-develop-1.1.6-1.fc6
>  >
>  > When I upgrade I get the following warning:
>  > Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
>  > xine-lib-extras-nonfree
>
>  You can't update your xine packages until Livna provides an
>  updated build of xine-lib-extras-nonfree that works with
>  xine-lib-1.1.6. 
... which is available since April 22nd:
http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Bill Case]

Hi;

Somebody is playing games.  Xine just updated correctly.

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 20:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  On 24/04/07, Markku Kolkka wrote:
>  > William Case kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika tiistai, 24.
>  > huhtikuuta 2007):
>  > > Yumex shows upgrades available: xine-lib-1.1.6-1.fc6 and
>  > > xine-lib-develop-1.1.6-1.fc6
>  > >
>  > > When I upgrade I get the following warning:
>  > > Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
>  > > xine-lib-extras-nonfree
>  >
>  > You can't update your xine packages until Livna provides an
>  > updated build of xine-lib-extras-nonfree that works with
>  > xine-lib-1.1.6.
>  
>  ... which is available since April 22nd:
>  http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/6/i386/
>   
-- 
Regards Bill

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Bob Goodwin]

William Case wrote:
>  Hi;
>
>  Somebody is playing games.  Xine just updated correctly. 
No improvement here:

--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package 
xine-lib-moles


Bob Goodwin

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Michael Schwendt]

On 24/04/07, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
>  William Case wrote:
>  > Hi;
>  >
>  > Somebody is playing games.  Xine just updated correctly.
>  No improvement here:
>
>  --> Running transaction check
>  --> Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
>  --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>  Error: Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
>  xine-lib-moles 
It won't improve if you don't enable a repository that offers an
updated and compatible xine-lib-moles package.  xine-lib-moles is not
a Fedora package and not a Livna package either. And xine-lib at
Fedora is at 1.1.6 already.

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Sjoerd Mullender]

Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  On 24/04/07, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
> > William Case wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > Somebody is playing games.  Xine just updated correctly.
> > No improvement here:
> >
> > --> Running transaction check
> > --> Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > Error: Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
> > xine-lib-moles
>  
>  It won't improve if you don't enable a repository that offers an
>  updated and compatible xine-lib-moles package.  xine-lib-moles is not
>  a Fedora package and not a Livna package either. And xine-lib at
>  Fedora is at 1.1.6 already.
>   
The problem is not with xine-lib, the problem is with xine-lib-moles.
xine-lib-moles is offered by freshrpms (perhaps others?) and is not yet
updated.  xine-lib from Fedora (Core or Extras I don't know, nor do I
care) was updated to 1.1.6, and so yum wants to update it.  But
xine-lib-moles was not yet updated and it depends explicitly on
xine-lib-1.1.5.  So there is a conflict: xine-lib updated to 1.1.6 is
not compatible with xine-lib-moles which want xine-lib-1.1.5.

So the solution is to either:
1. remove xine-lib-moles and do the update
2. exclude xine-lib (or rather xine*) until freshrpms made an updated
xine-lib-moles available.

-- 
Sjoerd Mullender

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Bob Goodwin]

Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
>  Michael Schwendt wrote:
>    
> > On 24/04/07, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
> >     
> >> William Case wrote:
> >>       
> >>> Hi;
> >>>
> >>> Somebody is playing games.  Xine just updated correctly.
> >>>         
> >> No improvement here:
> >>
> >> --> Running transaction check
> >> --> Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
> >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> >> Error: Missing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 is needed by package
> >> xine-lib-moles
> >>       
> > It won't improve if you don't enable a repository that offers an
> > updated and compatible xine-lib-moles package.  xine-lib-moles is not
> > a Fedora package and not a Livna package either. And xine-lib at
> > Fedora is at 1.1.6 already.
> >
> >     
>
>  The problem is not with xine-lib, the problem is with xine-lib-moles.
>  xine-lib-moles is offered by freshrpms (perhaps others?) and is not yet
>  updated.  xine-lib from Fedora (Core or Extras I don't know, nor do I
>  care) was updated to 1.1.6, and so yum wants to update it.  But
>  xine-lib-moles was not yet updated and it depends explicitly on
>  xine-lib-1.1.5.  So there is a conflict: xine-lib updated to 1.1.6 is
>  not compatible with xine-lib-moles which want xine-lib-1.1.5.
>
>  So the solution is to either:
>  1. remove xine-lib-moles and do the update
>  2. exclude xine-lib (or rather xine*) until freshrpms made an updated
>  xine-lib-moles available.
>
>     
I don't know what xine-lib-moles is for or where it came from?  I could 
remove it if I was certain I don't need it, guess yum remove will tell 
me ...

But this morning, for the first time in three days, I was able to do an 
update without excluding xine so something has changed at last.

Bob

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Tim]

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 05:38 -0400, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
>  I don't know what xine-lib-moles is for or where it came from? 
> I
>  could remove it if I was certain I don't need it, guess yum remove
>  will tell me ... 
I don't have it, everything I've tried to play with it has worked, so I
don't need it.  According to a quick Google search, it adds some files
which aren't in the main package (yeah, that's really descriptive!).

-- 
(This box runs FC6, my others run FC4 & FC5, in case that's
 important to the thread.)

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.

Xine-lib=1.1.5 dependency -- now what do I do ?? -- SOLVED

[Bob Goodwin]

Tim wrote:
>  On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 05:38 -0400, Bob Goodwin - W2BOD wrote:
>    
> > I don't know what xine-lib-moles is for or where it came from?  I
> > could remove it if I was certain I don't need it, guess yum remove
> > will tell me ...
> >     
>
>  I don't have it, everything I've tried to play with it has worked, so I
>  don't need it.  According to a quick Google search, it adds some files
>  which aren't in the main package (yeah, that's really descriptive!).
>
>     
Yum didn't seem to think it was needed either, yanked it out without a 
question, 4.0 megs!

Tnx.  Bob Goodwin

[Michael Schwendt]

On 24/04/07, William Case wrote:
>  Hi;
>
>  Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
>  dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
>  the = sign) before. 
It is the typical notation for "equal to" and is used in thousands of
packages. Instead of "=" it can also be ">=", "<=",
">" and "<", for
example. Here, a package "xine" with exactly version "1.1.5" is
needed, so xine-lib-1.1.5.

http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview...

>  However imaginatively write a yum install command
>  using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
>  from yum. 
It is a Fedora Extras package, which is at 1.1.6 already.

>  Now what do I do? 
What repositories do you use? Which package requires this old version
of xine-lib?

[Brian Millett]

Michael Schwendt escribío:
>  On 24/04/07, William Case wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
> > dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
> > the = sign) before.
>  
>  It is the typical notation for "equal to" and is used in thousands of
>  packages. Instead of "=" it can also be ">=", "<=",
> ">" and "<", for
>  example. Here, a package "xine" with exactly version "1.1.5" is
>  needed, so xine-lib-1.1.5.
>  
>  http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview...
>  
>  
> > However imaginatively write a yum install command
> > using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
> > from yum.
>  
>  It is a Fedora Extras package, which is at 1.1.6 already.
>  
> > Now what do I do?
>  
>  What repositories do you use? Which package requires this old version
>  of xine-lib?
>   
Well for me it the following:
 Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles

I know that there is a lag time waiting for it to become available from
Livna

To upgrade other items do

yum --exclude=xine* upgrade

otherwise wait.

-- 
Brian Millett - [ "And Now For A Word"]
THE PSI CORPS IS YOUR FRIEND. TRUST THE CORPS.

[Rex Dieter]

Brian Millett wrote:
>  Michael Schwendt escribío:
> > On 24/04/07, William Case wrote:
> >> Hi;
> >>
> >> Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
> >> dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
> >> the = sign) before.
> > It is the typical notation for "equal to" and is used in thousands of
> > packages. Instead of "=" it can also be ">=",
> "<=", ">" and "<", for
> > example. Here, a package "xine" with exactly version "1.1.5" is
> > needed, so xine-lib-1.1.5.
> >
> >
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview...
> >
> >
> >> However imaginatively write a yum install command
> >> using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
> >> from yum.
> > It is a Fedora Extras package, which is at 1.1.6 already.
> >
> >> Now what do I do?
> > What repositories do you use? Which package requires this old version
> > of xine-lib?
> >
>  
>  Well for me it the following:
>   Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
>  
>  I know that there is a lag time waiting for it to become available from
>  Livna 
xine-lib-moles is/was provided by freshrpms last I knew (livna only does
xine-lib-extras-nonfree).

-- Rex

[Ric Moore]

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 09:03 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  Brian Millett wrote:
>  > Michael Schwendt escribío:
>  >> On 24/04/07, William Case wrote:
>  >>> Hi;
>  >>>
>  >>> Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
>  >>> dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
>  >>> the = sign) before.
>  >> It is the typical notation for "equal to" and is used in thousands of
>  >> packages. Instead of "=" it can also be ">=",
> "<=", ">" and "<", for
>  >> example. Here, a package "xine" with exactly version "1.1.5"
> is
>  >> needed, so xine-lib-1.1.5.
>  >>
>  >>
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview...
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>> However imaginatively write a yum install command
>  >>> using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
>  >>> from yum.
>  >> It is a Fedora Extras package, which is at 1.1.6 already.
>  >>
>  >>> Now what do I do?
>  >> What repositories do you use? Which package requires this old version
>  >> of xine-lib?
>  >>
>  > 
>  > Well for me it the following:
>  >  Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
>  > 
>  > I know that there is a lag time waiting for it to become available from
>  > Livna
>  
>  xine-lib-moles is/was provided by freshrpms last I knew (livna only does
>  xine-lib-extras-nonfree). 
Which to use? I remain confused. Ric
--

[Michael Schwendt]

On 24/04/07, Brian Millett wrote:
>  Michael Schwendt escribío:
>  > On 24/04/07, William Case wrote:
>  >> Hi;
>  >>
>  >> Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
>  >> dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
>  >> the = sign) before.
>  >
>  > It is the typical notation for "equal to" and is used in thousands of
>  > packages. Instead of "=" it can also be ">=",
> "<=", ">" and "<", for
>  > example. Here, a package "xine" with exactly version "1.1.5" is
>  > needed, so xine-lib-1.1.5.
>  >
>  >
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/6/i386/repoview...
>  >
>  >
>  >> However imaginatively write a yum install command
>  >> using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
>  >> from yum.
>  >
>  > It is a Fedora Extras package, which is at 1.1.6 already.
>  >
>  >> Now what do I do?
>  >
>  > What repositories do you use? Which package requires this old version
>  > of xine-lib?
>  >
>
>  Well for me it the following:
>   Processing Dependency: xine-lib = 1.1.5 for package: xine-lib-moles
>
>  I know that there is a lag time waiting for it to become available from
>  Livna 
Who says that xine-lib = 1.1.6 is not in the transaction set already?
xine-lib-moles is not provided by livna or Fedora.

[Ric Moore]

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 00:50 -0400, William Case wrote:
>  Hi;
>  
>  Yum returns that before I can upgrade Xine I need Xine-lib=1.1.5 as a
>  dependency.  I have never seen anything written as Xine-lib=1.1.5 (with
>  the = sign) before.  However imaginatively write a yum install command
>  using  Xine-lib=1.1.5, with and without the livna repo, I can get no joy
>  from yum.
>  
>  Now what do I do?
>  
>  By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual? 
Bill, I highly recommend
smart. You get a nice gui that shows every rpm
out there with a nice search function. If you search for Xine, you'll
see what is available and the ones you currently have installed. Really
nice. IMHO it's beats the pants off of yumex. Give it a whirl! Ric

--

[Bill Case]

Hi Ric;

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 13:16 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
>  On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 00:50 -0400, William Case wrote:
>  > By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual? 
>  Bill, I highly recommend smart. You get a nice gui that shows every
> rpm
>  out there with a nice search function. If you search for Xine, you'll
>  see what is available and the ones you currently have installed. Really
>  nice. IMHO it's beats the pants off of yumex. Give it a whirl! Ric 
Thanks Ric.  I had planned to give 'smart' a whirl when I install Fedora
7.  Not that the version/core number matters; its just that I have so
many small and large learning curves over the next 6 weeks that I have
given myself to climb.  A new install of fedora seemed like a good
benchmark to add new applications to try out.

By the way, does 'smart' have a good manual.  'man' yum and yumex
--no-help, are pretty rudimentary if you want to go deeper than just
trial and error.
-- 
Regards Bill

[Ric Moore]

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 13:54 -0400, William Case wrote:
>  Hi Ric;
>  
>  On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 13:16 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
>  > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 00:50 -0400, William Case wrote:
>  > > By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual?
>  
>  > Bill, I highly recommend smart. You get a nice gui that shows every rpm
>  > out there with a nice search function. If you search for Xine, you'll
>  > see what is available and the ones you currently have installed. Really
>  > nice. IMHO it's beats the pants off of yumex. Give it a whirl! Ric
>  
>  Thanks Ric.  I had planned to give 'smart' a whirl when I install Fedora
>  7.  Not that the version/core number matters; its just that I have so
>  many small and large learning curves over the next 6 weeks that I have
>  given myself to climb.  A new install of fedora seemed like a good
>  benchmark to add new applications to try out.
>  
>  By the way, does 'smart' have a good manual.  'man' yum and yumex
>  --no-help, are pretty rudimentary if you want to go deeper than just
>  trial and error. 
What I liked about smart is that if you prod it a little and dink around
with it, it all comes perfectly clear how to use it! THAT is what I like
in an app, that you can wave hands hovery hovery and it comes to life
and does cool stuff. I had a couple of questions and got them resolved
on the list, so I've never peeked at the docs... and I'm a complete
idiot. :) Ric

--

[Kam Leo]

On 4/25/07, William Case <billlinux(a)rogers.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hi Ric;
>
>  On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 13:16 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
>  > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 00:50 -0400, William Case wrote:
>  > > By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual?
>
>  > Bill, I highly recommend smart. You get a nice gui that shows every rpm
>  > out there with a nice search function. If you search for Xine, you'll
>  > see what is available and the ones you currently have installed. Really
>  > nice. IMHO it's beats the pants off of yumex. Give it a whirl! Ric
>
>  Thanks Ric.  I had planned to give 'smart' a whirl when I install Fedora
>  7.  Not that the version/core number matters; its just that I have so
>  many small and large learning curves over the next 6 weeks that I have
>  given myself to climb.  A new install of fedora seemed like a good
>  benchmark to add new applications to try out.
>
>  By the way, does 'smart' have a good manual.  'man' yum and yumex
>  --no-help, are pretty rudimentary if you want to go deeper than just
>  trial and error. 
Unfortunately, the documentation is a work in progress.
Home/development page is http://labix.org/smart . Most recent release
is at version 0.5. To get started install the following packages:

smart
smart-gui
smart-update
ksmarttray                            (if you use KDE)
fedora-package-config-smart

You will end up with smart configured for Fedora repositories. 3rd
party repositories are left up to you.

>  Regards Bill

[oleksandr korneta]

on 04/26/2007 11:40 PM Kam Leo wrote:
>  On 4/25/07, William Case <billlinux(a)rogers.com&gt; wrote:
> > Hi Ric;
> > 
> > On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 13:16 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 00:50 -0400, William Case wrote:
> >>> By the way is yumex ever going to produce a help manual?
> >> Bill, I highly recommend smart. You get a nice gui that shows
> >> every rpm out there with a nice search function. If you search
> >> for Xine, you'll see what is available and the ones you currently
> >> have installed. Really nice. IMHO it's beats the pants off of
> >> yumex. Give it a whirl! Ric
> > Thanks Ric.  I had planned to give 'smart' a whirl when I install
> > Fedora 7.  Not that the version/core number matters; its just that
> > I have so many small and large learning curves over the next 6
> > weeks that I have given myself to climb.  A new install of fedora
> > seemed like a good benchmark to add new applications to try out.
> > 
> > By the way, does 'smart' have a good manual.  'man' yum and yumex 
> > --no-help, are pretty rudimentary if you want to go deeper than
> > just trial and error.
>  
>  Unfortunately, the documentation is a work in progress.  
It seems to be in progress quite for a while now. I'm using smart for
more almost two years now and I agree with Reek Moore, that I'm stuck
with it only thanks to its comprehensive and user-friendly interface,
otherwise I would give up pretty soon.


-- 
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta

/The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from./