April 2009 - websites - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Mark C. Kime

The following header seems to be originating from your site, if it is, please take the privileges away from the sender. It is causing a great deal of trouble for my company. Thank you Return-path: <explore-bounces(a)mail.jldlists.com> Envelope-to: mark(a)valpomall.com Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:51:52 -0400 Received: from impinc01.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.13.101] helo=impinc01.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1Lr0Tg-0005So-9j for mark(a)valpomall.com; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:51:52 -0400 Received: from lists.jldlists.com ([69.27.136.26]) by impinc01.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id cRrr1b0160aLmXZ02RrrxL; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:51:52 -0400 X-EN-OrigIP: 69.27.136.26 X-EN-IMPSID: cRrr1b0160aLmXZ02RrrxL Received: from lists.jldlists.com (lists.jldlists.com [127.0.0.1]) by lists.jldlists.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n370eVii002736; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:48:37 -0500 Received: from vmail.positech.net (vmail.positech.net [69.27.136.8]) by lists.jldlists.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n35EfM5v001434 for <explore(a)jldlists.com>; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:41:22 -0500 Received: from omta0109.mta.everyone.net (imta-38.everyone.net [216.200.145.38]) by vmail.positech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1CD10F2025 for <Explore(a)physicianrecruiters.com>; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:38:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dm0205.mta.everyone.net (sj1-slb03-gw2 [172.16.1.96]) by omta0109.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2277B62A07; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:39:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Eon-Dm: dm0205 Received: by dm0205.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 62c6408b) id dm0205.49d40e26.4820da; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 07:39:34 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQMH08dJ2MKm+qHfUgIAAAAF,5cb7309009d3cd29d0348c6abbc9b0ad Message-Id: <8B500C81-AF89-4FCF-AEB8-4F01664D0A1F(a)wt.net> From: Monte Tucker <mtucker(a)wt.net> To: "Nino Del Padre" <nino(a)delpadre.com> In-Reply-To: <5CC05619BDE64EF09D0F601E49505022@BOXXW8400> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-789653032 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) X-Priority: 3 Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:39:34 -0500 References: <C5FD4945.111BB%neuropod(a)surgical.net> <5CC05619BDE64EF09D0F601E49505022@BOXXW8400> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-JLDTech-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-JLDTech-MailScanner-ID: 6D1CD10F2025.6B335 X-JLDTech-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-JLDTech-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.011, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 0.01, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00) X-MailScanner-From: mtucker(a)wt.net X-JLDTech-MailScanner-Watermark: 1239547101.3804@C76oVhh0uEcOrqv4f/c2SQ Cc: Explore(a)physicianrecruiters.com X-BeenThere: explore(a)lists.jldlists.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: <explore.lists.jldlists.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.jldlists.com/mailman/listinfo/explore>, <mailto:explore-request@lists.jldlists.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.jldlists.com/pipermail/explore> List-Post: <mailto:explore@lists.jldlists.com> List-Help: <mailto:explore-request@lists.jldlists.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.jldlists.com/mailman/listinfo/explore>, <mailto:explore-request@lists.jldlists.com?subject=subscribe> Sender: explore-bounces(a)mail.jldlists.com Errors-To: explore-bounces(a)mail.jldlists.com Subject: spam? Re: [Explore] Remove Best regards Mark C. Kime, President IntegraCraft http://integracraft.com w 219 464-7776 c 219 309-0931 f 708 575-0615

14 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora Infrastructure] #532: get-fedora link to additional information for jigdo downloads

by fedora-badges

#532: get-fedora link to additional information for jigdo downloads -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: afarris | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Webmaster | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Changes (by mmcgrath): * owner: ricky => webmaster Comment: anyone on the web team want to get this? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/532#comment:2> Fedora Infrastructure <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure> Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code.

14 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

SHA1SUM Error

by Cae Sium

New to Fedora and downloaded F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso<ftp://allotter.yandex.net/fedora/linux/releases/test/11-Beta/Live/x86_64/...> from Fedora's official link. The contents of F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM is: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 4950de1a6b7062e00006bc99d3edf46776bf8d19506faaf4f6d3b52d5f382adc *F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBSc1NdR3Fx1jSLnfyAQKoZBAApXIJHRSyKW4IGSVpZ9mMCE3Ju6zse9k8 nHvXH9QLIYGRrCxRNvsQy8tXW0owsUFzAqrXmTuB+D8uRnVVcAPQABD4JXpd2AR2 QG8KkGEUxyUejTxM5avoAme5a2KPszGWpHTh7SQxJfyzFWqgEpd/E1HHLCu//rij g7lBRjpDz6mXz5ZVO8EQ6K2yOscerco/yMglR4fGwAo+483CtRSNz60ePReqXWq1 WS5ksTlUDfHU2zXoGR8et/pu1CZ//x0jQKc21ZXGEflO0qJm/aj7N5amedlPnV// b3hfPOTQfmc0kyzM/Zq+fDbwqJDd5mR5Dq14oOzakNlGYx2eCRVxnuwum3MvNmKh QwNhlyf9RxCp1bzvpzFWZjuTSuGDuFFiG7LOnDW3ZouvkyVHwQ7ZbUacMienU2b2 oGCyBRYoRc78Qa5m+RD/8AR505p2mFs9+Ut0KnMj2+WL7lckj6ebcN9Qb3lmv+a/ DNEPMErPvrZK2/D9qTZt5igT6HfnIsc2eMqJmQUixNTEwZZpLnoc3KUDy76JIQ9m m2IUtzNgA3SXu6ODvDNsMJijttfFBJ/pMJ8qs9PAcw/zge+4qIRKE0iWZMapwngN xAQGu/m2RfPWAqWndv/5F2myDVAGDcbfPcNuTo6k54jY9CxpbVs/yqlTPrYzzkNz oKxCbwJ/IXI= =wURW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- After downloading the iso, I did a check using sha1sum F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso <ftp://allotter.yandex.net/fedora/linux/releases/test/11-Beta/Live/x86_64/...> and got the following output: a7bdb8f6af60902971511fd3cf5fb242c6818c01 F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso re-downloaded the iso, did the same check and got the same output: a7bdb8f6af60902971511fd3cf5fb242c6818c01 F11-Beta-x86_64-Live-KDE.iso Am I checking incorrectly or is the sha1sum posted on the website wrong? Appreciate some advice. Thanks.

14 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

Fedora 11 countdown banner (artwork team release)

by Paolo Leoni

In the past days some people have requested a F11 countdown banner for a blog using. So, below you can find a proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/b/b7/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banne... https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/0/00/Deepsky-fedora11-countdown-banne... The original background image was downloaded from here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonythemisfit/3387589463/sizes/o/ License seems to be ok for Fedora. Feedbacks are welcome. -- Paolo Leoni ~ http://pleoni.altervista.org

14 years, 6 months

3
4
0 / 0

[Fwd: Re: Download confusion]

by Rahul Sundaram

14 years, 6 months

3
3
0 / 0

gpg checking downloads

by Tom Horsley

The torrents for the Fedora downloads include gpg signed checksum files (SHA1SUM for old releases, *-CHECKSUM for fedora 11 beta and wot-not). It would sure be handy to have instructions directly on the download pages that tell you how to actually verify the signature and check the checksums :-). Is this a good place to complain about that, or is another list or bugzilla component better? (copied this from my fedora-list posting, might want to check the thread for additional replies) https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-April/msg00403.html

14 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

Fedora 11 Countdown Banner?

by Marc Ferguson

Hi, I have the same JavaScript code on my blog that was used for the Fedora 10 release. I saw a blog entry ( http://blog.berkenpies.nl/2009/04/02/fedora-11-countdown-counter-part-2/) talking about the Fedora 11 counter, but it's the same exact code that I have on my site. My site is still showing Fedora 10. Does a Fedora 11 counter exist? -- Marc F. www.fergytech.com Registered Linux User: #410978 "When life gives me lemons... I make Linuxaide, hmm good stuff!"

14 years, 6 months

4
7
0 / 0

Broken link: http://fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/updates/10/Everything/i386/os/

by Andy

Hi, This link appears to be broken, which has caused my yum from working. http://fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/updates/10/Everything/i386/os/ Can you please provide an alternate link for the same? Regards, Andy

14 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

Adding links for the netinst.iso images to get-fedora-all

by Todd Zullinger

Hi, There was a recent thread¹ on fedora-list mentioning that it seemed a bit difficult to find the netinst.iso images. I'm wondering if a simple patch like the following may be appropriate and helpful to other folks looking for the netinst image? diff --git i/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html w/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html index 56effcb..e42fcc6 100644 --- i/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html +++ w/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/x86...">${_('x86_64')}</a></li> <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/ppc...">${_('ppc')}</a></li> </ul> + <h4>${Markup(_('Minimal boot media'))}</h4> + <ul> + <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i38...">${_('i386')}</a></li> + <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/x86...">${_('x86_64')}</a></li> + <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/ppc...">${_('ppc')}</a></li> + </ul> </li> </ul> <h3>${Markup(_('Fedora Desktop Live Media'))}</h3> It would make the output look like this: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/tmp/get-fedora-netinst.png It doesn't add much width or height to the Install Media block. I'm not sure about the heading to be used. I went with Minimal boot media as that was close to what the installation guide uses. Better wording is always welcome. (I do have commit access to fedora-web, though I use it sparingly. But if this change is agreeable, I'm happy to push it.) BTW, I noticed that the Jigdo heading doesn't use Markup() while the rest of the page does. Should that be changed for consistency? Or perhaps the other headings with no html in them lose the Markup()? Or should I worry less about things I don't know enough about? :) ¹ http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-March/msg01259.html -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The only difference between the saint and the sinner is that every saint has a past and every sinner has a future. -- Oscar Wilde

14 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

problem downloding fedora 10 dvd

by biju kbm

I have downloads 3.16 gb(92) of fedodra live dvd usig orbit downloads manager after that an error occured (403 forbidden) please help to downloads the remainig portion of fedora

14 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites April 2009