Bela Pesics wrote:
>And let's be honest about this.
>
>Those sites are providing a service that we cannot provide. They are
>more valuable to the user community as community run projects.
>
>If we ran them or more formally sanctioned them by redirecting from our
>domain, Fedora could be seen/held responsible for the content of those
>sites.
>
>
What kind of responsibility do you mean? All the contents and quality
of not fedoraproject maintained sites connected to fedoraproject some
ways is its resopnsibility anyway.
It doesnt always work that way legally. Refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal.
E. g. why don't you put ads on
fedoraproject.org, I guess the reason is evident.
The reason we dont put ads is that nobody has got any reason to do that
yet and we havent thought about it. Thats all.
--
Rahul