On 2009-11-19 05:19:58 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
This should only be needed until the rel-eng adds some explanatory
text
directly to the *-CHECKSUM files. This is planned for F13 (by Oxf13 ;).
---
Thoughts? Is 'warning' too strong? I wasn't sure if 'note' would
stand out enough. Perhaps I'm just grumpy after seeing so much
confusion about this. ;)
I'm also torn about the placement. It might be better to move up to
the top of the page, above the "Windows user?" note.
fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html
b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html
index f763b01..51a2402 100644
---
a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html
+++
b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
<li><a
href="https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i686-Live...
(KDE)</a></li>
<li><a
href="https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-Li...
(KDE)</a></li>
</ul>
+ <p class="warning">
+ ${Markup(_('Please note that the <i>Hash: SHA1</i>
line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does
<b>not</b> specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso
files.'))}
+ </p>
<p>
${Markup(_('Next, import Fedora\'s GPG key(s):'))}
</p>
--
1.6.5.2
Tiny thing, I'd use <emph> instead of <i> for this. Also,
it might be
good to place this above the checksum links at least for those that just
click the links immediately.
While we're making changes to this page, there's also the issue that
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-fil...
is woefully out of date and still references SHA1 for those that click
on the Windows user link :-(
Not what can really be done abou that last bit though.
Thanks,
Ricky