Re: Adding links for the netinst.iso images to get-fedora-all

[Todd Zullinger]

I probably should have known not to send out a patch for comments on a
Friday (Friday the 13th even).  But, proving that I don't learn, I'm
resending it on April Fools Day.  ;)

Anyone have thoughts on this?

I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was a recent thread¹ on fedora-list mentioning that it seemed a bit
> difficult to find the netinst.iso images.  I'm wondering if a simple
> patch like the following may be appropriate and helpful to other folks
> looking for the netinst image?
>
> diff --git i/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html w/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html
> index 56effcb..e42fcc6 100644
> --- i/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html
> +++ w/fedoraproject.org/data/content/get-fedora-all.html
> @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@
>              <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/x86_64/jigdo/">${_('x86_64')}</a></li>
>              <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/ppc/jigdo/">${_('ppc')}</a></li>
>          </ul>
>    <h4>${Markup(_('Minimal boot media'))}</h4>
>    <ul>
>        <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-10-i386-netinst.iso">${_('i386')}</a></li>
>        <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-10-x86_64-netinst.iso">${_('x86_64')}</a></li>
>        <li><a href="http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/ppc/iso/Fedora-10-ppc-netinst.iso">${_('ppc')}</a></li>
>    </ul>
>    </li>
>
>    </ul>
>    <h3>${Markup(_('Fedora Desktop Live Media'))}</h3>
>
> It would make the output look like this:
> http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/tmp/get-fedora-netinst.png
>
> It doesn't add much width or height to the Install Media block.  I'm
> not sure about the heading to be used.  I went with Minimal boot media
> as that was close to what the installation guide uses.  Better wording
> is always welcome.
>
> (I do have commit access to fedora-web, though I use it sparingly.
> But if this change is agreeable, I'm happy to push it.)
>
> BTW, I noticed that the Jigdo heading doesn't use Markup() while the
> rest of the page does.  Should that be changed for consistency?  Or
> perhaps the other headings with no html in them lose the Markup()?  Or
> should I worry less about things I don't know enough about? :)
>
> ¹ http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-March/msg01259.html