I tried just now and following are my thoughts :
1) The first page is good. But a clear heading like "Vote for President "
will be good rather than "Real President Nominee".
2) When the user wants to know the info about a Nominee, once he clicks the
link "info", it is better to have a pop-up, rather than redirecting the
whole page.
3) A non-uniformity is there in the Nominee's information. It is true that
the control directs us to the user homepage. But for this President Nominee
stuff, it is good to develope a generic page having information populated
regarding that Nominee.
4) Why the site is re-directed to
when the user request for
more information on the President Ranking page ?
5) After confirming the Vote, the user is redirected to the initial home
page. But the following appears at the bottom.
"Build time: 0.115s, Page size: 2.23KB"
It is truely required to display to the end-user ?
6) When tried to view the results, by clicking "Community", iam facing this
problem.
500 Internal error
Overall, it looks fine.
-Roopesh
On 5/29/08, Nigel Jones <dev(a)nigelj.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
With Fedora 9 out the door we hit a very busy time for elections, the
previous system was, well lets just say, not optimal.
So I accepted the goal of creating an application by our post-release
election season that would integrate well with FAS and would allow a
different method of voting, Range Voting.
If your not familiar with Range Voting check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting the essentials however is that
you rank candidates from 0<-># of candidates, if you don't like them, just
rank them 0.
In the future, the application will not only allow the Board and Steering
Committees to hold elections, it will (hopefully) become available to SIGs
and Steering Committees for any time of poll/call to vote.
This is where you all come in, it's impossible for a small group of people
to find every possible mistake or bug in ANY item of software, so the more
people we can get in to test it and report bugs/issues/thoughts the better!
All I ask is 10-20 minutes of your time, whenever your free over the couple
of days to test and provide feedback.
Instructions:
1) You'll need an account on the test instance of FAS at
http://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ (PLEASE) do not use your
normal password and you don't need to do CLA etc (I've removed that
requirement in the elections app for now).
2) Please direct your browser to
https://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/elections/ and test away!
3) Try voting etc, make sure that you *can* view the results at
https://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/elections/results/fedora but can't
view the results at
https://publictest10.fedoraproject.org/elections/results/president
Notes:
* I'm aware the UI is absolutely awful, there is already a ticket open for
this (
https://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/4) please feel free to add
items there.
* Any errors you encounter that are 'unexpected' to you, please file a
ticket at
https://fedorahosted.org/elections/newticket setting Milestone
to 'Release 0.1.0' with full reproduction steps, and the time it occurred
(TZ=UTC date)
* Any other feedback can be directed to the elections-devel list (
elections-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org)
After 5am UTC on the 1st June both elections will end and the 'results'
should be public and hopefully we'll have a decent election app!
Thanks a lot & Happy Testing,
Nigel Jones
p.s. Sorry to those that fall asleep during my e-mail - I nearly did too!
p.s.s. Thanks must be given to Toshio, Ricky, Luca and Mike who have all
assisted in this release
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list