On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 18:10 -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:11:39PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:23:58AM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:53:04AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:43 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, tiansworld
> > > > <tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I forgot to mention that this git clone is needed for cloning
the
> > > > > readme-burning-iso git repo for publishing the doc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That page is fairly old. I've never needed the doc utils to
publish
> > > > Burning ISOs.
> > >
> > > More than "fairly" old. fedora-docs-utils was used prior to
Publican.
> > > Somewhere around Fedora 10 or 11 we converted all the documents to
> > > Publican.
> >
> > Agreed. This is why the Trac instances for docs is bad. Too much
> > old "common" data gets posted and never updated.
>
> ACK:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/readme-burning-isos/wiki/WikiStart?action=history
>
> That WikiStart page hasn't been updated in years. But any FAS user
> can update it, so I encourage someone to modify it as necessary, no
> sacred cows.
Paul: Is there any reason to keep the Trac instance at all? Perhaps now would be a good
time to terminate these instances and just maintain the regular wiki. AFAIK, no one is
using the ticketing systems or any other piece of Trac.