Re: Can't publish readme-burning-iso to docs for Fedora 18 to docs website

[Pete Travis]

On Apr 12, 2013 5:28 PM, <sparks(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA512
>
>  On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 06:22:56PM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
>  > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 18:10 -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
>  > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 03:11:39PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>  > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:23:58AM -0400, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
>  > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:53:04AM -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
>  > > > > > On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 09:43 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>  > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, tiansworld
>  > > > > > > <tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  > > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > > I forgot to mention that this git clone is needed for
cloning the
>  > > > > > > > readme-burning-iso git repo for
> publishing the doc.
>  > > > > > >
>  > > > > > >
>  > > > > > > That page is fairly old. I've never needed the doc
> utils to 
publish
>  > > > > > > Burning ISOs.
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > More than "fairly" old.  fedora-docs-utils was used
> prior to 
Publican.
>  > > > > > Somewhere around Fedora 10 or 11 we
> converted all the documents 
to
>  > > > > > Publican.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Agreed.  This is why the Trac instances for docs is bad.  Too much
>  > > > > old "common" data gets posted and never updated.
>  > > >
>  > > > ACK:
>  > > >
https://fedorahosted.org/readme-burning-isos/wiki/WikiStart?action=history
>  > > >
>  > > > That WikiStart page hasn't been updated in years.  But any FAS user
>  > > > can update it, so I encourage someone to modify it as necessary, no
>  > > > sacred cows.
>  > >
>  > > Paul: Is there any reason to keep the Trac instance at all?  Perhaps 
now
would be a good time to terminate these instances and just maintain the
regular wiki.  AFAIK, no one is using the ticketing systems or any other
piece of Trac.
>  >
>  > Or maybe replace everything on the trac with links to BZ
>
>  Well, there is more than BZ that would need to be linked to.  IMO, just 
getting rid
of the Trac instances would be far less confusing and less
stuff to maintain (for us and for Infrastructure).
>  - --Eric 
I'm all for dumping trac, since we don't use it.   There are some valuable
contribution guidelines I'd like to pull into the Documentation Guide
first, though.

--Pete