Missing configuration files for Alpine in Fedora 8, 9
by Michael Hannon
Greetings. I've been seeing some strange behavior with the "alpine"
package in Fedora 8 and 9 recently.
The gist of it is that there don't seem to be any configuration files
for alpine, even though RPM lists them.
Here's an example from a Fedora 8 system. I get the same thing on a
Fedora 9 system.
[root@localsys ~]# grep alpine /var/log/yum.log
Oct 27 16:58:27 Installed: alpine-2.00-1.fc8.i386
No complaints from the installer. OK, what got installed?
[root@localsys ~]# rpm -ql alpine
/etc/pine.conf
/etc/pine.conf.fixed
/usr/bin/alpine
/usr/bin/pico
/usr/bin/pilot
/usr/bin/rpdump
/usr/bin/rpload
/usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00
/usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00/LICENSE
/usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00/README
/usr/share/doc/alpine-2.00/tech-notes.txt
/usr/share/man/man1/alpine.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/pico.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/pilot.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/rpdump.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/rpload.1.gz
That shows not one but two configuration files in /etc/.
On the other hand, there are no such configuration files:
[root@localsys ~]# ls -ld /etc/*pine*
ls: cannot access /etc/*pine*: No such file or directory
Maybe something's wrong with the installation? RPM doesn't think so:
[root@localsys ~]# rpm --verify alpine
[root@localsys ~]#
This is significant because the alpine binary seems to have been
compiled with /usr/local as the default location for browsers, for
instance. I won't repeat the output here, but try:
strings /usr/bin/alpine | grep netscape
or
strings /usr/bin/alpine | grep lynx
I suppose this could be "fixed" by changing individual .pinerc files,
but that seems to be treating the symptom, not the problem.
Note that I have seen a directory:
/etc/alpine
on some systems, and on one system running Scientific Linux I do find a
file:
/etc/alpine/pine.conf
On the Fedora systems that I've examined, either the /etc/alpine
directory is missing altogether, or it is there but empty.
Is this a local problem, or are others seeing it too?
Thanks.
-- Mike
15 years, 8 months
F8 Decoding smartd\smartctl output.
by Frank Murphy
According to smartd, two drives are failing, googled and found the
smartctl command. But no idea how to comapre\decode it.
<snip>
/dev/sdc :
Prefailure: Raw_Read_Error_Rate (1) changed to
104, 101, 95, 97, 99, 100, 101, 102, 110, 109, 108, 107,
106, 103, 101, 100, 99, 97, 98, 96, 99, 101, 102, 103,
Usage: Airflow_Temperature_Cel (190) changed to
70, 68, 68, 67, 68, 67,
Usage: Hardware_ECC_Recovered (195) changed to
65, 64, 65, 64, 63, 64, 63, 61, 62, 61, 62, 63,
64, 63, 64,
Usage: Temperature_Celsius (194) changed to
30, 32, 32, 33, 32, 33,
/dev/sdd :
Prefailure: Raw_Read_Error_Rate (1) changed to
116, 114, 112, 109, 110, 107, 113, 115, 118, 117, 111, 114,
116, 117, 118, 119, 102, 106, 107, 108, 110, 109, 103, 112,
115, 117,
Usage: Airflow_Temperature_Cel (190) changed to
72, 71, 72, 71, 71, 70,
Usage: Hardware_ECC_Recovered (195) changed to
68, 67, 66, 65, 66, 68, 66, 65, 66, 63, 64, 63,
64, 63, 64, 67, 68, 67, 69,
Usage: Temperature_Celsius (194) changed to
28, 29, 28, 29, 29, 30,
</snip>
smartctl -A /dev/sda
smartctl version 5.38 [i386-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce
Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE
UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 100 253 006 Pre-fail Always
- 0
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 097 097 000 Pre-fail Always
- 0
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always
- 32
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always
- 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 066 060 030 Pre-fail Always
- 4740290
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 88
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 097 Pre-fail Always
- 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always
- 32
187 Reported_Uncorrect 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022 074 064 045 Old_age Always
- 26 (Lifetime Min/Max 18/26)
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 026 036 000 Old_age Always
- 26 (0 18 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 079 075 000 Old_age Always
- 109140652
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always
- 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age
Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always
- 0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age
Offline - 0
202 TA_Increase_Count 0x0032 100 253 000 Old_age Always
- 0
Frank
--
gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password :(
aMSN: Frankly3D
http://www.frankly3d.com
15 years, 8 months
FC9 : Pb with sata_via adaptor and sata disk
by Jean-Philippe Battu
Hello
On my linux box, I use a pci adaptor to provide sata port because my
motherboard doesn't
have serial ata port. My sata adaptor is a :
# lspci
...
02:0b.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6421 IDE RAID
Controller (rev 50)
...
#
When the system boots, the sata disk is well recognized. I can use fdisk
and mkfs to build
a filesystem without any problems
But, when I try to mount this filesystems, I can see these errors in the
/var/log/messages
kernel: EXT3-fs error (device sdc2): ext3_check_descriptors: Inode table
for group 4 not in group (block 99331)!
kernel: EXT3-fs: group descriptors corrupted!
If I use mkfs.ext3 command instead mkfs, I can't see this message but only :
kernel: VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sdc1
fdisk -l /dev/sdc gives me:
Disk /dev/sdc: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x198a1989
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1 1 60789 488287611 83 Linux
/dev/sdc2 60790 121601 488472390 83 Linux
this disk has been worked well on another machine. Is there any problem with
the sata_via kernel modules:
[root@mercure ~]# lsmod | grep sata
sata_uli 7940 1
sata_via 10756 0
libata 132328 6
pata_ali,sata_uli,sata_via,ata_piix,ata_generic,pata_acpi
# modinfo sata_via
filename:
/lib/modules/2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686/kernel/drivers/ata/sata_via.ko
version: 2.3
license: GPL
description: SCSI low-level driver for VIA SATA controllers
author: Jeff Garzik
srcversion: 4F5E9D4C56ABDD3C940464D
alias: pci:v00001106d00007372sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v00001106d00005372sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v00001106d00005287sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v00001106d00003249sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v00001106d00003149sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v00001106d00000591sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
alias: pci:v00001106d00005337sv*sd*bc*sc*i*
depends: libata
vermagic: 2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686 SMP mod_unload 686 4KSTACKS
#
Thanks for your help if you can help me
Cheers
Jean-Philippe Battu
15 years, 8 months
IPV6 NETFILTER
by potat0
HI,
im trying to build an IPV6 router on my lab using F6 (kernel 2.6). Unlike in IPV4, i can't set forwarding policy per interface in IPV6. Some articles stated that i have to use ipv6 netfilter / ip6tables.
so, im trying first with these lines:
#ip6tables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
#ip6tables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT
they don't work..
Any suggestions would be very helpful to me!
cheers,
FAZZETA
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=299524&topic...
If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmaster(a)fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame igannesha.gemilang(a)gmail.com.
15 years, 8 months
how do you get Spark IM to run on fc 9
by Gregory Machin
Hi
I would like to run Spark IM on my fc 9 x86_64 box as everyone else is
using this IM in the office .
I down loaded spark_2_5_8.tar.gz and unzipd it to /opt/
when I run ./starter I get
[root@gregory-workstation Spark]# ./starter
testing JVM in /opt/Spark/jre ...
and nothing happens ..
there are no java or spark processes running ..
What do I need to do to get it to work ?
15 years, 8 months
Newbie: Fresh install of FC9 - Boot hangs after login.
by Jonathan Hartzell
Newbie... My first post! XP (SP3) user, and one of the lucky ones with
no complaints. I'm drawn to the overall enthusiasm and philosophy of
all of you who've embarked on the Linux system adventure and am looking
forward to joining your ranks... but I seem to have stumbled in taking
my first step!
I've taken the best care I can in downloading the full distribution of
FC9, checking the integrity of the download, and checking the integrity
of the resulting DVD. Ran the graphical install (very user-friendly),
to sdb to avoid even a remote possibility of any MBR conflicts (XP is
exclusively on sda) with plenty of free space on sdb (319 gigs). All
went smoothly...
However on the first reboot (booting sdb), I continued to follow the
instructions, only to find that the Login process hung. Do I suck as a
Newbie, or has anyone else encountered this kind of problem?
Note: This being my first shot at Linux-related stuff, I don't have
anything but XP at this point to work with, and I won't have the usual
Linux type tools that most of you have who've simply upgraded to FC9.
I'm hoping one of you can tell me that the fault is mine, rather than
the installer DVD, as I'm concerned that I may not have the tools to
get myself back on the road. Sure would welcome some guidance out of
this apparent dead end!
Intel Pentium Dual Core @ 2.2 GHz
ASUS P5GC-MX/1333 Mother Board
ViewSonic VG2230wm Monitor
Standard 101 Keyboard
Microsoft PS/2 Mouse
4 Gigs Ram
2 500 Gig Sata Drives
NVidia GeForce FX 5500
M-Audio Delta 1010LT PCM sound board
Atheros L2 Fast Ethernet 10/100 Base-T Controller
Intel 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB Universal Host Controller
Let me know if any more info required.
Thanks for taking the time to read this.
15 years, 8 months
Fedora 9/10 and NVIDIA ?
by Kevin Kempter
Hi All;
I'm considering the purchase of a Dell 64bit laptop with an NVIDIA
video card.
- Intel Core 2 Duo Extreme Edition X9100 3.06GHz, 1067MHZ, 6M L2 Cache
Dual Core (224-3154)
- 1GB NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M Mobile Precision M6400 Covet (320-7518)
Anyone have any thoughts per Fedora 9/10 compatibility, potential
issues, gotcha's, etc ?
Thanks in advance.
15 years, 8 months
32 or 64-bit?
by John Aldrich
I'm about to the point of having to wipe and reinstall (except for some data
folders) my personal machine. I'm currently on FC6, but I'm looking at either
installing F9 or F10.
I use it more as a desktop machine, but I access it from remote via SSH and
VNC. I also use a DDNS name to access the machine.
My question is this: Is F9/F10 (Beta) ready for full 64-bit for a desktop
machine? I've got an AMD64 CPU and I'd love to use it to the full potential,
but only if it's ready for prime-time.
15 years, 8 months
File Manager super User gone???
by Rene Cusson
Hello,
Just installed Fedora 9 KDE desktop. Everything was fine untill i updated all the packages. Now there is no access
to file manager super user in the menu area. Is it hiding somewhere that i dont know about? How do you
become the super user when using dolphin? I googled this and others are having the same problem, but can't seem to find the answer.
Not looking for the su in the terminal. Want to be able to create folders in root. The create menu is disabled because i am not SU.
Thanx,
Rene
_________________________________________________________________
Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns...
15 years, 8 months
