Hacksaw wrote:
This is actually a misinterpretation of a much better idea: When
replying to a
message, quote the relevant passage you are replying to as concisely as
possible, preceeding each line with a non alphanumeric, preferably '>', then
add your reply in plain text.
Repeat as necessary.
Good suggestion. Thank you for it.
>3. Search the list archives before posting a question.
This leads me to another important suggestion. To aid in the searching, please
write subject lines that concisely tag the message. For instance, if you are
having a problem getting past the partitioning phase of an install of FC3,
don't set the subject to "Install Fails", set it to "Can't get
past
partitioning on FC3".
Again, I will add this.
Two other suggestions come to mind here. First is that you probably shouldn't
call it "List Rules". It might be better to call it "Suggestions to ensure
the
widest readership of your question or problem." This gets the goal across
nicely.
The eventual goal is to send these to Red Hat management to be adopted
and send to 'new' list members and to be made available on the Fedora
web site. This is why I posted them to the list for refinement by the
members of the list.
The second is that ad hominem attacks probably won't result in positive
action. In fact, in the old days, a million years ago in Internet time, we
called those sorts of posts "Trolls".
This is the number one reason that
we need 'guidelines' on acceptable
conduct. One of those guidelines is to leave moderation of the list to
the moderators. I've seen many messages about 'rule' infractions, but
no published rules to back them up.
--
James McKenzie
With assistance, Now running 2.6.11rc4, Software Suspend 2
and ibm-acpi .1
Need a home for my .rpm