On Tuesday 01 March 2005 11:34 am, David Hoffman wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:44:45 -0500, Carroll Grigsby
<cgrigs(a)earthlink.net>
wrote:
>> snip
> Also, you are mistaken about
> the archives. Both the MARC and Redhat archives *do* preserve threads.
Are you sure about that? Take a closer look at MARC archives. What's
wrong with these threads? They only show the "SOLVED" part of the
thread, but dropped off what led up to the solution. Changing the
subject line made it start a new thread.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110931389000001&r=1&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110916514900004&r=1&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=110910991400007&r=1&w=2
David:
My bad about MARC preserving threads. As noted by others, RH's Fedora archives
do preserve threading and that's a good thing.
-- cmg