On Saturday 26 February 2005 12:07, Stuart Sears wrote:
> >... Preface any text to be replied to with a
> > character, most folks use a greater than sign '>' but any special
> > printable character will suffice.
>
> I don't understand this bit about the '>' sign. If we use that for
> something it shows up as 'replied to' text. It could also benefit
> from being a seperate point perhaps.
Nope, that was exactly the point - a message you reply to
In that case it should read "Preface any text you are replying to with
a ..."
I think that has the correct meaning now.
Duncan
--
Linux user #372812: more stable and cheaper than windows
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0x2BB9667C21A8C63A: protecting your security