On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 21:08 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Craig White wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:16 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Trying to install mplayer I get the conflicting package:
>>>
>>> rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
>>> warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
>>> signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
>>> Preparing... ###########################################
>>> [100%]
>>> file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
>>> faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
>>> libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
>>>
>>> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
>>> libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
>>>
>>> It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
>>> Are they the same ?
>>> Should I just use --nodeps ?
>>>
>> ----
>> if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
>>
>> it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older one
>>
> Thank.
>
> Do you mean that faad-libs is an older version than libfaad2 ?
> If yes, why mplayer requires faad2-libs and not libfaad2 ?
> (yum install mplayer from rpmfusion).
>
----
# rpm -q --whatrequires faad2-libs
ffmpeg-libs-0.5-2.fc11.i586
mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11.i586
xmms-faad2-2.7-1.fc11.i586
faad2-devel-2.7-1.fc11.i586
I don't know where you got libfaad2-1.2.7-16 from but it seems to be a
problem here.
It is weird.
rpm -q --whatrequires libfaad2
no package requires libfaad2
rpm -e libfaad2
error: Failed dependencies:
libfaad.so.2()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
xine-lib-1.1.16.3-20.fc11.x86_64
--
---
==========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry | | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516
Heslington | |
York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: pd520(a)york.ac.uk
==========================================================================