Hi
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Others are coming up with conjectures and presenting them as fact to
back up a particular position (the one that it's the responsibility of
projects to chase the latest and greatest infrastructure change).
There is no conjecture in what I said whatsoever. It is purely a fact.
Remember that the original question was "Does it work with fvwm?" and "Hm,
not really useful when it doesn`t work with existing WMs ...". I was
merely pointing out that Wayland is just a protocol. Adding support for
the protocol is done within the window managers and not the other way
around.
In their best interest if needed. But you didn't try to claim
it's the
*responsibility* of projects to change to Wayland.
Those two things are not in
conflict. If they do so, it would their
responsibility to do the porting and maintain them. Noone suggested that
we should force them.
Rahul