----- Original Message -----
From: "John Summerfield" <debian(a)herakles.homelinux.org>
To: "For users of Fedora" <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: What's all the hype over Ubuntu?
Ian Chapman wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> But I must admit, I never really understood that viewpoint as yum has
>>> basically eliminated "dependency hell" and wondered what was
magically
>>> different about deb.
>>
>> Try to find something that isn't included in the standard repository.
>> With fedora, you won't even find the names of additional repositories
>> documented, so you ask here. You'll get several different answers and
>> if you are looking for Sun Java, none of them will apply. For anything
>> else, like vlc or the Nvidia driver, you add all the recommended repos
>> and tell yum to install something and you'll get rpm conflicts. With
>> ubuntu, you enable the pre-configured extra repositories, pick what you
>> want and you are ready to run it.
>
> So it seems it's more about packaging strategy and what distros offer,
> rather than debs necessarily being inherently superior to rpm. I can
> understand what you've said in the context of Fedora and Ubuntu but Suse
> offers much of the same "non-free" stuff. Maybe Mandriva too I can't
> remember. I'd always assumed they were referring to the days when you
> tried to install program1.rpm which then said it needed libfoo.rpm, which
> in turn needed libbar.so.1 which you had to figure how which rpm it was
> in and so on, which is why I thought that viewpoint seemed outdated.
>
debs have different information, and the ability to have different
strength dependencies:
requires, like with rpm
recommends - may work better with these
suggests -- may work better with these.
At one point (years ago) I had to install X on RHL to use Ghostscript.
Complete nonsense of course, but dpkg might have handled that better.
apt-get is about equivalent to yum, but does more such as download and
(optionally) build source - it can get and install build deps too, it's
quicker (at least with simple stuff) (at least with default options).
apt-get (like up2date) can download updates without installing them:
apt-get -yud dist-upgrade
yum's tools might be equivalent, but it's a terrible mish-mash. AFAIK
there's no proper equivalent _in yum_ to the above apt-get command which
fetches all available updates and copes with adding new packages - it's
not only for release upgrades equivalent to f8 to f9.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa(a)coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
I'm not a programmer please keep that in mind, could a mirror be set up to
use apt? I used it on RH 7.3 @ Dag, and had forgot about it untlil then.
But I assume a mirror will need help for free from smarter people than I.