Le 10/02/2018 à 09:32, Ed Greshko a écrit :
On 02/10/18 16:12, François Patte wrote:
> Le 09/02/2018 à 18:46, Rick Stevens a écrit :
>> On 02/09/2018 08:05 AM, François Patte wrote:
>>> Le 09/02/2018 à 15:33, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>>> On 02/09/18 22:13, François Patte wrote:
>>>>> Seems to be an empirical way to solve the problem! Nobody knows what
is
>>>>> responsible for such a message (Authenticate result for user cath :
>>>>> User not known to the underlying authentication module)? What is
this
>>>>> module and how to inform it that a new user was added?
>>>> Well, since I am the only one who has responded to your query and since I
only know
>>>> what I have found by using google, I guess nobody knows for sure what is
causing the
>>>> problem.
>>> Trying your trick gives the same result: once the password has been
>>> given, lightdm behaves like if it was a wrong password and user can't
log!
>>>
>>>> At this point are you more interested in getting that user logged in
under lightdm or
>>>> finding out why they have been unable to?
>>> I am interested in both, it is quite boring that something has been done
>>> somewhere and messages in log files are not enough explicit to solve the
>>> problem.... This tends to make the system more secretive.
>>>
>>> I googled too, and find some answer related to pam, to ldap.... Nothing
>>> about lightdm!
>> Please check the system logs. It may be an issue with libcrypt (e.g. the
>> version desired isn't there). I've had that issue with a laptop before
>> where the PAM system wanted libcrypto.so.6 (which was what was
>> originally installed way back when) but the current version was
>> libcrypto.so.10.
> In that case wouldn't be impossible to login for all users?
>
>
Would you consider to try another DM?
DM?
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte