True.. If you'd like we can continue offline. I will add one further
comment: multiple antennas are typically MIMO (multiple input multiple
output), which is cool unless your endpoint device does not support it.
Which wifi cameras likely don't.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin(a)fastmail.us> wrote:
On 02/18/17 11:33, InvalidPath wrote:
> Sounds like your situation would benefit from a pair of semi-directional
> antennas. Back before we moved I had an Ubiquiti out in the barn as
> 'chicken-overwatch' but now I use the same one to upload static images to
> Wunderground via a cron ftp job on an Ubuntu vm.
> Like my ubiquiti cam you *might* have luck browsing the cameras file
> structure. I.e. Im able to ssh into my camera and pull those static images
> from a specific dir.. from what I read other models you could pull streams
> via VLC and write them to a video file locally.
At 2.5 GHZ antennas are a trade off between some directional gain and
transmission line loss and they are one more component to deal with, °and
these routers each have three, I'm not sure how they are arranged
functionally? I think the receivers are the critical element. Antennas will
be a last resort.
I have two other cameras in other locations, at least five years old now,
poor quality but still working and displaying on VLC.
This is not strictly Fedora so I think any further communication should be
off list or we will hear about the ground rules, etc.
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
box10 FEDORA-25/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org