On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 09:06 +0200, Frank Elsner wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 08:50:27 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:15:57 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 07/31/2018 10:57 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
> > > Can you please explain the line
> > > 2018-08-01T05:53:36Z INFO Installed: kernel-4.17.9-200.fc28.i686
> > > from /var/log/dnf.rpm.log of my 32bit F28 system?
> >
> > What is there to explain? That is version 4.17.9 of the kernel, 32-bit
> > non-PAE, built for F28.
> > Do you have more than 4GB of RAM in the computer?
>
> Ok, my fault. This old system with 2GB runs a non-PAE kernel.
>
> But on my TP x230i with 8GB running F28 file /var/log/dnf.rpm.log shows
> 2018-07-23T08:41:52Z INFO Installed: kernel-PAE-4.17.7-100.fc27.i686
> ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Forget this. That was before the upgrade to F28. Overlooked that
> And yumex shows kernel-4.17.9-200.fc28 for arch i686 available in updates repo.
> So, my question is: What could prevent dnf from offering this version for update?
This question is still awaiting an answer.
I don't use yumex, but if it's looking in the yum database while dnf
looks in the dnf one, there could be an inconsistency. Just a thought.
poc