Using 32bit FC4 on CeleronD 64bit?
by Fennix
Is there any problem to install FC4 I386 onto the 64bit CeleronD or
must I use just the 64 bit version?
Another question....I am running FC4 on my work computer and now have
a subscription alert message. Fedora is the open version unlike the
current RedHat releases. Is there any need to enable the subscripion?
I do not think subscribing is required for FC4 updates/patches....
Fennix
18 years, 8 months
fc4 on AMD64 dual core
by Amadeus W.M.
Just wondering what are people's experiences on dual core AMD64. Is this
architecture fully supported by fc4? Is fc4 stable on this architecture?
Is fc4 optimized for amd64 x2?
I looked up the recommended motherboards at the AMD web site and all but a
few had an Nvidia chipset (the others VIA). Do I have to worry about
drivers? Do I have to download drivers from Nvidia the way we do for the
Nvidia video cards each time we upgrade the kernel? Which chipset is
natively supported by fc4?
Thanks!
18 years, 8 months
Gnome 2.12 in FC4
by Roger Grosswiler
Hi,
Will Gnome 2.12 be implemented in FC4? I just saw it in the Devel-Tree.
Roger
18 years, 8 months
old kernel kernel-2.6.12-1.1398 install ?
by Chris Jones
Hi,
I would like to install an older FC4 kernel, kernel-2.6.12-1.1398 as I suspect
it might be the last version I had suspend-to-ram working with. I cannot
though find it in the usual yum repos - Is there anywhere I can download the
rpms (kernel and devel) from ?
cheers Chris
18 years, 8 months
NFS with kernel 2.6.12-1.1456
by Tiziana Manfroni
On Fedora 4 with kernel 2.6.12-1.1456 I have problem with NFS Server.
With ethereal I see an error on protocol NFS
"LOOKUP Replay Error: ERR_NOENT" when a NFS client mounts server's disks.
On Client in /var/log/messages I see :
"kernel: lockd: failed to monitor ip.nfs.server"
Do you have any idea?
Thanks
Tiziana
18 years, 8 months
Official Update Gnome 2.10 to 2.12?
by Roger Grosswiler
Hey,
Does anybody know, if it is expected to get Gnome 2.12 via official
fedora-yum-repositories for update? Or will it just be in FC5?
Roger
18 years, 8 months
how to start kde
by Gavin Li
I changed start default runlevel to 3
and I want to start KDE after login, so I input command startkde, but it
failed, can't found display, etc
Another question: if runlevel is 5, how to setup to start kde not gnome in
that login window, It can't remember my last time login settings.
BTW, I installed both gnome and kde. the kde desktop icons will disappear if
the fist time login is login to gnome. but it will be ok if the first time
is login to KDE just after install. It happens in most of the FC release.
18 years, 8 months
Re: CD/DVD mounted read only so I can't write
by Nick Bishop
> It appears that when the CD creator mounts the CD
> it mounts it read only so that the write fails.
I know this thread is a bit old, but an observation
...
I normally use mkisofs followed by cdrecord to write
CD's (and I believe they work with DVD's as well).
$ man mkisofs
and
$ man cdrecord
for the next 3 hours (HINT: 99% of the time you want
to use mkisofs options -r and -J)
Nick Bishop, email replies ignored.
-----
Disclaimer, n:
Advice to the reader that they should put their
lawyer away.
-oOo-
____________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Movies: Check out the Latest Trailers, Premiere Photos and full Actor Database.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
18 years, 8 months
RE: NFS and denying access to subnets
by Mike McGrath
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Neil Marjoram
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:31 AM
> To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> Subject: NFS and denying access to subnets
>
> OK I've been trying for ages now but I just can't seem to get
> this into my head.
>
> I have 8 subnets on my network 10.1.1.0 mask is
> 255.255.255.224 or /27, I would like all but one of these
> subnets to be able to mount from my NFS server. So I thought
> I'd add the relevant lines into /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny;
>
> It's long, so I've shortened it.
> /etc/host.allow
> portmap:10.1.1.0/255.255.255.224
> lockd:10.1.1.0/255.255.255.224
> mountd:10.1.1.0/255.255.255.224
> rquoted:10.1.1.0/255.255.255.224
> statd:10.1.1.0/255.255.255.224
> portmap:10.1.1.32/255.255.255.224
> lockd:10.1.1.32/255.255.255.224
> mountd:10.1.1.32/255.255.255.224
> rquoted:10.1.1.32/255.255.255.224
> statd:10.1.1.32/255.255.255.224
>
> And all the other 5 networks.
>
> And in the /etc/hosts.deny
>
> portmap:10.1.1.160/255.255.255.224
> lockd:10.1.1.160/255.255.255.224
> mountd:10.1.1.160/255.255.255.224
> rquoted:10.1.1.160/255.255.255.224
> statd:10.1.1.160/255.255.255.224
>
> I have restarted NFS and Portmap, but alas those systems on
> the 160 network can still mount and see nfs mounts.
>
> Am I barking up the wrong tree and is there an easier way to
> accomplish this ?
>
> Many thanks
>
> Neil.
>
whats your /etc/exports look like? I think you can do the following:
/home 10.1.1.32/255.255.255.224(rw)
/home 10.1.1.160/255.255.255.224(noaccess)
-Mike
18 years, 8 months
