Can GRUB boot GRUB?
by Iain Stephen
Hi all,
I have two HDDs sda and hda.
sda (master SATA):
WindowsXP (30GB) Only because I need it for OU work.
FC4 (200GB) Because I love it.
hda (master IDE):
Debian (20GB) Because I like trying other Linux's.
I would like to use hda for Debian (or perhaps testing FC5) but I want
GRUB on hda to be independent of GRUB on sda; so that if Debian updated
its version of GRUB's menu.lst I wouldn't need to edit menu.lst on sda.
What I'm looking for is a way for GRUB on sda to boot GRUB on hda in the
same way as GRUB can boot Windows.
I've tried googeling and reading the man pages and although there are
plenty of examples of editing menu.lst to boot other OS's I can't find
what I want, GRUB (sda) boot GRUB (hda).
Is it possible or have I just missed it?
--
_
( ) ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and propriatery attachments.
X Registered Linux user #394675; registered machine #296028.
/ \ Regards, Iain.
18 years, 4 months
RE: samba shares in FC4
by Craig Preston
I don't think the fact it is on a separate partiotion should have
anything to do with it. I take it the directory exists, and you haven't
accidentally created a file called public in the data directory. If you
go ls -ld /data/public it sees the directory ok?
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Louis E Garcia II
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2006 1:13 PM
To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: samba shares in FC4
Yes it was a typo.
Your suggestion didn't help. I know I have the conf file right because
if I change the public share to something under / like /boot it works
fine. But because /data is a separate partition I'm having trouble.
> I that a typo? Guest ok - yes, should be an =
>
> Set writable = yes in the public section and remove read only.
>
> Hope that helps
> > I am trying to share a directory in FC4. readable and writable to
everyone.
> >
> > The directory is /data/public : 2777 root:root. It is an ext3
partition.
> >
> > This is my smb.conf:
> >
> > [global]
> > workgroup = HOMENETWORK
> > netbios name = server
> > server string = Samba Server
> > security = SHARE
> > guest account = guest
> > hosts allow = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0.0/24
> > hosts deny = 192.168.0.1/24
> >
> > [public]
> > comment = Public Stuff
> > path = /data/public
> > read only = No
> > guest ok = Yes
> >
> >
> > I am able to browse the server but when I open the share public I
> > get an error that the directory doesn't exist.
> >
> > The /data directory is a ext3 partition. I am able to share a
> > directory in the / partition with no problems.
> >
> > I am stumped. --Louis
> >
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
18 years, 4 months
Hard disk drivers at bootup with new kernel
by Phillip
We have a High Point Sata controller. When we boot up with an updated
kernel, the OS reports that it cannot find the disk.
How do we tell the new kernel at boot up where to find the driver?
Details: grub can see the available kernels; booting on the old kernel
works; booting with the new kernel gives the cannot find disk message.
18 years, 4 months
RE: samba shares in FC4
by Craig Preston
I that a typo? Guest ok - yes, should be an =
Set writable = yes in the public section and remove read only.
Hope that helps
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Louis E Garcia II
Sent: Friday, 24 February 2006 12:30 PM
To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: samba shares in FC4
I am trying to share a directory in FC4. readable and writable to
everyone.
The directory is /data/public : 2777 root:root. It is an ext3 partition.
This is my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = HOMENETWORK
netbios name = server
server string = Samba Server
security = SHARE
guest account = guest
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1, 192.168.0.0/24
hosts deny = 192.168.0.1/24
[public]
comment = Public Stuff
path = /data/public
read only = No
guest ok - Yes
I am able to browse the server but when I open the share public I get an
error that the directory doesn't exist.
The /data directory is a ext3 partition. I am able to share a directory
in the / partition with no problems.
I am stumped. --Louis
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
18 years, 4 months
How-To for FC4/Samba
by Ed Babin
Can someone point me to a step-by-step on samba w/FC4? Honestly, I'm only
trying a basic share, no rocket science. I've already a samba server on RH9
with the same clients and users trying to access a share on FC4. Logs and
testparm returns everything fine. Had SELINUX on and off. Cannot browse even
home directories.
Thanks,
exasperated
18 years, 4 months
Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 24, Issue 230
by Tod Merley
>
>
> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:47:37 +0100
> From: "antonio montagnani" <antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Wget, Yum and network investigation
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <4c37b6af0602231447p44562489t(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> 2006/2/23, Tod Merley <todbot88(a)gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:27:20 +0100
> > > From: "antonio montagnani" < antonio.montagnani(a)gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: Wget, Yum and network investigation
> > > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
> > > Message-ID: < 4c37b6af0602230927w6098941k(a)mail.gmail.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> > >
> > >
> > Hi Antonio!
> >
> > From the thread I do not know which of the routers you updated from the
> RH8,
> > but I would guess that it is the one you are having problems on. That
> is
> > just a guess. It may be that something related to the IPv6 stack
> handling
> > was not handled in the process.
>
> Yes...it is the updated router: but it worked for a long time with FC5
> and I didn't have any problem at all with yum, wget....I can't
> understand what changed
>
> >
> > I would be most interested in the contents of /etc/resolv.conf on all
> > machines. It would be nice to know who is being looked at for name
> > resolution.
> >
>
> I will post the troubled router tomorrow morning as now I am at home.
> Anyway this is the resolv.conf of this machine, i.e. the router with
> no problems....
>
>
> nameserver 62.211.69.150
> nameserver 212.48.4.15
>
> and modprobe.conf
>
> alias eth0 ne2k-pci
> alias eth1 sk98lin
> alias eth2 hisax
> alias snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0
> options snd-card-0 index=0
> install snd-intel8x0 /sbin/modprobe --ignore-install snd-intel8x0 &&
> /usr/sbin/alsactl restore >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
> remove snd-intel8x0 { /usr/sbin/alsactl store >/dev/null 2>&1 || : ;
> }; /sbin/modprobe -r --ignore-remove snd-intel8x0
> alias usb-controller ehci-hcd
> alias usb-controller1 uhci-hcd
>
>
> > When I troubleshot an IPv6 name resolution problem at home here I used
> > "tcpdump -w captureFileName &" along with Ethereal to analyze the
> tcpdump
> > capture files. When I did it some of the packets were truncated so it
> would
> > be best to use -s 0 (capture packets of arbitrary length) or -s
> 1515(capture
> > packets as large as the max Ethernet frame) in the tcpdump command.
> >
> > In my case, turning off IPv6 (accomplished, I believe, by adding "alias
> > net-pf-10 off" to /etc/modprobe.conf and rebooting) did resolve the
> problem
> > on a single FC4 machine. Since I had an Ubuntu machine on the same
> network
> > and could see no way to effectively turn off IPv6 on that machine I
> simply
> > routed nameservice arround the DSL modem which appeared to have problems
> > with IPv6 name serving (probably a frimware problem) and the problem
> went
> > away. Of course to do this there needed to be an alternative nameserver
> in
> > /etc/resolv.conf.
> >
> >
>
> Ipv6 has been turned off on office router, but no improvement.What went
> wrong??
> >
> > Tod
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Antonio
> Skype : antoniomontag
Hi again Antonio!
I just have a bit of a thought here. You may have simply a problem with the
URL names requested by yum. Is it possible that somehow the repositories
have been re-named (their URLs) and that was not completed in the update
process. If I try to nslookup or whois the long repo URLs you sent in your
first message they fail. Are the addresses differant (the requested URL's
yum is attempting to access) on the two machines? If I point firefox at the
addresses it finds them - perhaps the "redirection" switch in a yum config
file is set differently. Just bits of thoughts.
I must say I am curious what kind of Internet access you have over there?
How do you get Internet to the machines?
Ethereal gets down to the nitty gritty and would probably be a good one to
do here. Of course it takes time.
Good Hunting!
Tod
18 years, 4 months
file names lower-cased on cp from CD
by Joel Rees
Not sure if this is OT or not, but I'll ask anyway.
The CD was apparently burned on a MSWxxx box with a shift-jis file
system. (At any rate, there are shift-jis file names in the mix.)
That the shift-jis file names get mojibake-d is one thing, but latin
file names throughout the CD come out all lower-case, which of course
mucks up javac.
Anybody with any ideas as to why, and as to how to get around this kind
of behavior?
18 years, 4 months
sound problem after updating to kernel-2.6.15-1.1831_FC4
by Jack Wallen
today i did an update to the kernel listed above. after the update i
rebooted only to discover no sound. i re-ran the soundcard detection but
to no avail. the card is an onboard via 8237 that was working just fine
before the update.
i've googled it a bit but have found no mention of this issue.
anyone have any idea what's going on and how to resolve the problem?
thank you so much.
--
jack wallen, jr
get your pantz off, get your skirt on
www.monkeypantz.net
18 years, 4 months
Slow FC4, perhaps swap is to blame
by John Degenstein
Alright, to begin here are my system specs:
Athlon 64 3200+
512 MB PC2100 DDR
200 GB SATA
160 GB IDE
Nvidia GF4 4000 (128MB)
This is a problem I have been trying to fix for several months now,
and I am pretty sure it is the swap space on this computer has
something to do with it. When I first start up the computer it is
blazing fast, and I have no problem filling 4 workspaces up with
resource intensive programs. But as the days and weeks wear on the
computer gets progressively slower, to the point where simply
switching between workspaces with only 3 or 4 programs open becomes
incredibly slow. The problem also seems to relate to programs that
use Java, such as azureus and qnext, it seems to me that there is some
kind of memory leak that builds up in the swap space over time. Even
after the swap space has been filled I attempt to clear it by closing
all open programs, but this has no effect and it is beginning to drive
me crazy.
I did manage to find a command which I somehow got to work at least
several times:
swapoff -a /dev/logVol00/_something_here
This command alleviated my problems immediately, but then I started to
get errors about running out of memory from new programs I was trying
to open so I enabled swap again with the command "swapon". Another
possible source of my problems is the fact I am running PC2100 DDR
rather than the minimum that my motherboard supposedly supports,
PC2700, because of this I had to underclock some of the components on
my mobo so that the computer would boot.
So I guess my main question is: is the swap space in Linux messed up,
or is it simply a problem from Java???
Thanks in advance,
John Degenstein
18 years, 4 months
