That being said, lets avoid further discussion about the licensing Google
and Yahoo. This is about a calendar, not the morals, policies, etc. of two
large corporations. *We need to stay on topic.*
Sayonara,
Kamisamanou Burgess
http://www.kamisamanou.net
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 00:06, Kamisamanou Burgess <
kamisamanou(a)kamisamanou.net> wrote:
Sayonara,
Kamisamanou Burgess
http://www.kamisamanou.net
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:29, Máirín Duffy
<mairin@linuxgrrl.com<https://mail.google.com/mail?view=cm&tf=0&to=mairin@linuxgrrl.com>
> wrote:
>
> Actually, Zimbra is not just the desktop client, it's the server too. And
> it was bought by Yahoo but built by a smaller company at first.
>
> Looking like they are friendly to open source doesn't mean Google is open
> source. Yahoo! is very friendly to open source and actually uses open source
> where Google does not.
>
> ~m
Please don't twist my words. I never said Google was open source, merely
that they are involved. Also Google Chrome is open source, the last part of
your last sentence is untrue.