On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 08:02 +1000, Nicholas Manojlovic wrote:
I think I preferred it when Ardour was in the CCRMA repo. Not only
was
it quicker, I trust its been built with music in mind.
I don't think there is any difference re: packaging between the Fedora
and Planet CCRMA repositories (if anything Fedora packages should be
better quality because of peer review, etc, etc). But that should not
translate normally into any audible or musical differences.
The slower turn around is a direct consequence of how Fedora works and
is, I believe, unavoidable.
-- Fernando
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
<nando(a)ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> ZC Miao wrote:
> > [quote]
> > Ardour 2.4 released
> > Submitted by paul on Mon, 2008-03-31 21:03. :: Articles
> > Well, its over a month later than expected, but Ardour 2.4
is finally
> > here. A respectable list of new features, many small
improvements and an
> > important set of bug fixes make up the news for this one.
Read more
> > below ...
> > [/quote]
> >
> > So, when will we get it in F8?
> >
>
> In F-8, I dunno, it is on its way to rawhide / F-9 beta now.
Considering that
> this not purely a bug fix release I'm not sure if we want to
release this as an
> update to F-8. What do others on this list think?
I would release it on Fedora 8. It has bug fixes and I think
other users
would probably appreciate having the latest.
> You could grab the srpm from rawhide and build it for F-8,
and provide us with
> some feedback on it, that might help.
I'll probably try a release in the Planet CCRMA testing
repos...