Justin, did you reject the majority of the changes I put in the etherpad
(
http://etherpad.osuosl.org/gEd6j1IEX0) or did it get omitted in your
editing pass?
Also, I suggest a different picture as this one makes the CoC seem like
an old document you pull out to look at and maybe have sentimental
thoughts about. I consider our CoC to be a living document.
regards,
bex
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016, at 07:59 AM, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 07:57 AM, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
> > As this document was read-only, I responded in the corresponding issue:
> >
https://pagure.io/fedora-diversity/issue/4
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016, at 07:09 PM, Justin W. Flory wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> Earlier, Amita wrote a draft of an article to introduce and explain the
> >> Code of Conduct to a general audience on the Fedora Community Blog. I
> >> did a quick round of edits and wanted to gather some more feedback and
> >> comments from others about the proposed article.
> >>
> >> I'm also including the FPL and soon-to-be FCAIC to check this out too
> >> since I think this post is a big deal in helping broadcast an
> >> interpretation to our Code of Conduct. Want to make sure we get this
> >> shaped right from the start. :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/?p=2407&preview=1&_ppp=34...
> >>
> >> Please let us know what your thoughts are, all. Thanks!
> >>
>
> I think all feedback was worked into the article now - putting out the
> link for review once more:
>
>
>
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/?p=2407&preview=1&_ppp=06...
>
> We're probably going to aim for a publication of this in the next week.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Justin W. Flory
> jflory7(a)gmail.com
>
> Email had 1 attachment:
> + signature.asc
> 1k (application/pgp-signature)