7:55 p.m.
I feel that we are not able to discuss in depth certain tickets due to
constrained meetings times and/or having a packed agenda.
Extending the 1 hr time slot doesn't seem like a feasible solution here due
to the meeting time being office timings in timezones where most of our
team is based. Instead, should we go back to weekly meetings and in each of
our meetings focus on few specific pre-decided tickets (2 or 3 max)? This
would leave us a lot of time to discuss specific topics and it wouldn't
feel like discussions are being cut-off or hurried.
We can still have 1 video call meeting every month.
Best,
Bee
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Jona Azizaj <jonaazizaj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 to video call meetings, I think would help us a lot
On 7 Apr 2017 2:33 pm, "Justin W. Flory" <jflory7(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 04/07/2017 04:54 AM, Amita wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2017 11:32 PM, Radka Janekova wrote:
>> I find irc meetings about some of these things to be a little bit of
>> an obstacle at times, maybe considering bluejeans meeting about the
>> more difficult topics could help too? (Just throwing in an idea...)
>>
>> As far as my availability goes, I'm okay with the day and the time.
> I liked the idea (a lot). Lets do it in this way -
>
> 1. We start meeting on IRC
> 2. Give out link of blue jeans so that anyone can join in
> 3. We will record the meeting in Blue jeans (which can serve as logs)
> 4. We will take note/write down (major highlights of meeting) on IRC as
> well during the discussion
> 5. We will publish blue jeans recording link and the IRC notes as
> meeting MOM.
>
> If this works for everyone, lets make it a practice for every alternate
> meeting.
>
> Thanks,
> Amita
I like this outline too, and it also ensures that we are still
documenting important points via IRC too. So long as we actively
remember to add important notes into IRC, I see this as a good
compromise too, for people who may want to participate but are limited
by bandwidth for an audio/video call.
I suggest we make this change for the May 3rd meeting (and also adjust
our time back to 12:00 UTC, starting on April 19). I will adjust the
time in Fedocal for this now.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Radka
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
------------
>> *Radka Janeková*
>> *radka.janek(a)redhat.com <mailto:radka.janek@redhat.com>*
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Justin W. Flory <jflory7(a)gmail.com
>> <mailto:jflory7@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> ===========================================================
============
>> = Quick Summary
>> =
>> ===========================================================
============
>> (1) Would changing the meeting time help attendance?
>> (2) Would lengthening the meeting by 30min help productivity?
>> (3) Are there other ways we can improve our meetings?
>> ===========================================================
============
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> During our meeting today, we had a brief discussion towards the end
>> about our meeting times and whether they are effective. For the
>> past few
>> meetings after the FAD, activity hasn't been consistent. In
February,
>> our meetings had seven attendees, but across March and April so
>> far, our
>> meetings have been between 3-5 active participants.
>>
>> The past few months have been busy for a lot of people for different
>> reasons, but we were thinking it might be helpful to check in and
see
>> what people are thinking about the existing meeting time. Would it
be
>> helpful to move it to a different day or time? Is there something
that
>> would help make the meeting time more accessible?
>>
>> We were thinking two things today in the meeting:
>>
>> (1) Possibly finding a new time
>> (2) Extending meeting time slot by 30 minutes
>>
>> We're most effective when we have active participation and we have
>> sufficient time to cover our topics. We would be interested to
>> know what
>> you all think about this and if a new time would work well. If you
>> have
>> any other feedback on how to make our meetings more accessible or
>> engaging? Please let us know your thoughts. :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Justin W. Flory
>> jflory7(a)gmail.com <mailto:jflory7@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fedora Diversity Team mailing list --
>> diversity(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> <mailto:diversity@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> diversity-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> <mailto:diversity-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fedora Diversity Team mailing list -- diversity(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to diversity-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora Diversity Team mailing list -- diversity(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to diversity-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Fedora Diversity Team mailing list -- diversity(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to diversity-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
Fedora Diversity Team mailing list -- diversity(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to diversity-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org