We haven't had a compelling affirmation for a Fedora Insight FAD on the list, proposed to take place at ILF in three weeks, so in the interest of time and allowing people to get reasonable airfare, I would like to suggest that we not have a Fedora Insight FAD at ILF, and that we go with the budget that we've articulated thus far. In this past week's FAmNA meeting, Ben Williams also expressed interest in attending, and so I added airfare for him.
Our itemized budget request is outlined at:
The total request, with some buffer, is $2200 for six Ambassadors to attend; some of us will also like take part in the DrupalCon which follows the main conference day, on Sunday, March 27.
Could I ask FAmSCo to please consider this budget request and let us know ASAP? Many thanks!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I just finished creating drupal6-yubikey module. I tested it out on my
Fedora 14 box and realized that Drupal installed at /usr/share/Drupal
and the module was installed at /usr/share/Drupal6/module which is a
problem. Should the modules be put in Drupal or Drupal6?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 03/02/2011 04:44 PM, Mike Hideo wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 04:02 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 02/28/2011 11:58 PM, Mike Hideo wrote:
>>> How do we get a commitment that there will be a process to govern this
>> What would you like? We can schedule a formal review process with the
>> various community groups to discuss the future of L10N technologies
>> after the F15 release, if that is what you're looking for.
> Thank you, Tom.
> Should we work the program manager or with yourself directly? I am
> mindful I am spamming lists.
Robyn Bergeron is the Program Manager, she should be able to schedule
this and ensure that all interested parties are invited.
Hi Fedora Insight and FWN teams --
We have a linux festival coming up in Indiana in about three weeks that I am coordinating Fedora presence for, and we've talked a bit about having a Fedora Activity Day there for Fedora Insight.
I've outlined some ideas we could work on for such a FAD. I will be there, and we can likely get funding for stickster from the Community Architecture budget. The question I want to pose to all of you is: what should we focus on with a FAD?
There is undoubtedly value in bringing a virtual team together physically upon occasion, but we are dispersed rather widely -- Jef in the Netherlands, tactica in LATAM, asrob in Hungary, Andreas in Italy, stickster and pcalarco in USA. It also seems that we are mostly behind the packaging & theming stages and will hopefully be in production with FWN three weeks from now.
So from my perspective, one area we could really focus on next is planning for additional content after FWN, and the FAD could serve a useful purpose for this.
Alternatively, we could look at having the FAD further out -- either this summer (perhaps at SELF in June?) or in the Fall.
Thoughts? We need to wrap up the budget by the end of this week, so please send your feedback!
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011 @22:00 UTC (17:00 EST/14:00 PST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting."
"Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of
the QA Team."
For more details about this meeting see:
In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 15 Alpha Blocker list:
Talk to you today (sorry for the late notice; I think I've touched base
with it on most folks about it for this week, though. I'm officially ill.)
On 02/28/2011 11:58 PM, Mike Hideo wrote:
> How do we get a commitment that there will be a process to govern this
What would you like? We can schedule a formal review process with the
various community groups to discuss the future of L10N technologies
after the F15 release, if that is what you're looking for.