2009/8/11 Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com>:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:26:50PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 13:03, John Poelstra<poelstra(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > satya komaragiri said the following on 08/04/2009 05:00 AM Pacific Time:
> >> Can Beacon be added to agenda as well if there is anything the list
> >> would like to discuss? I can make it at the scheduled time. I have
> >> informed the Beacon upstream about this meeting and have got a
> >> response in the affirmative.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Satya
> >
> > I'm sorry we haven't been able to get this onto the meeting agenda. Do
> > we still need to discuss it? Is there a bug to tracking its packaging?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
>
> Beacon is still in development so no bug has been filed for packaging.
> Probably should make one so we don't forget about it.
Huh, I was sure that filing a package for review was early in the
process, but I don't see an obvious request filed.
I'm not aware of any package for review as I don't think the software
has been completed.
> Satya: Can you give the list an update and progress report on Beacon, please?
This is from last week to f-docs-l:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2009-August/msg00041.html
Yeah, I'm hoping to have an update of this for tonight's meeting.
We've had some changes this Summer with expectations for Beacon. I
wanted to see it integrated with Zikula, but there can't be a
dependency between the two efforts. My last recommendation, which
mainly concurred with Yaakov's, is to get Beacon running stand-alone
and integrated with FAS access to
fedorahosted.org DocBook XML
sources.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1580
- Karsten
--Eric