2009/8/11 Karsten Wade kwade@redhat.com:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:26:50PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 13:03, John Poelstrapoelstra@redhat.com wrote:
satya komaragiri said the following on 08/04/2009 05:00 AM Pacific Time:
Can Beacon be added to agenda as well if there is anything the list would like to discuss? I can make it at the scheduled time. I have informed the Beacon upstream about this meeting and have got a response in the affirmative.
Regards, Satya
I'm sorry we haven't been able to get this onto the meeting agenda. Do we still need to discuss it? Is there a bug to tracking its packaging?
Thanks, John
Beacon is still in development so no bug has been filed for packaging. Probably should make one so we don't forget about it.
Huh, I was sure that filing a package for review was early in the process, but I don't see an obvious request filed.
I'm not aware of any package for review as I don't think the software has been completed.
Satya: Can you give the list an update and progress report on Beacon, please?
This is from last week to f-docs-l:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2009-August/msg00041.html
Yeah, I'm hoping to have an update of this for tonight's meeting.
We've had some changes this Summer with expectations for Beacon. I wanted to see it integrated with Zikula, but there can't be a dependency between the two efforts. My last recommendation, which mainly concurred with Yaakov's, is to get Beacon running stand-alone and integrated with FAS access to fedorahosted.org DocBook XML sources.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1580
- Karsten
--Eric