On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:52:48AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:50:38AM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:00:07PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> > * Packaging (stickster, 20:10:53)
> > * LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=InsightReviews <--
> > Insight package review tracker (stickster, 20:11:21)
>
> footnotes and advanced-help are done and submitted as updates for el5,
> el6 and f14. Co-maintainers welcome.
>
> > * HOWEVER... Sven and Volker may have identified a potential issue
> > wrt. Obsoletes on the package reviews that are for *renamed*
> > packages. These are packages that are moving from e.g. drupal-cck to
> > drupal6-cck (stickster, 20:16:13)
> > * Need help on the list figuring out whether those packages need to
> > have a different Obsolete. (stickster, 20:16:42)
>
> If you look at the reviews you'll note that Jon has already fixed the
> error in the obsoletes direction.
Yup, fantastic -- and thank you for your helpful and instructive
comments in the bug reports.
> > * ACTION: asrob will package remaining "Top 10" modules from
> >
drupal.org (stickster, 20:36:33)
> > * ACTION: stickster will review remaining "Top 10" modules once
> > packaged (stickster, 20:36:49)
>
> I can help out with the reviews too if needed. Just post a note with
> pending review requests to this list.
Here's where we track all of them:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=InsightReviews
Any package reviews that are needed for Insight should block this bug
(#662103).
Sorry to reply to myself, but here's another useful URL, in short
form:
http://ur1.ca/2ymrs
This is a list of all bugs blocking the InsightReviews bug that do not
have the flag fedora-review+ set (meaning reviews are incomplete).
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com