On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:40:11PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:47:49AM -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> And it's now basically decided that I need to take the X out of
the
>>>>> EVR for all modules, and transtion drupal* to drupal6* in rawhide,
and
>>>>> to drupal5* in EL-5? If this is correct, I'll get on it this
week.
>>>>>
>>>> Unless we want to suggest a change to the FPC which I wouldn't know
how
>>>> to justify.
>>>>
>>>> I'll change my pending review request to use drupal6* and only
request
>>>> branches for F15 and EL.
>>>>
>>> In my opinion this needs to happen. Let's put together a request for
>>> the FPC or whoever to evaluate. This shouldn't be a big deal and we
>>> are not going to get anywhere just going back and forth here.
>>> Clearly there is a need here and we can make this happen sooner.
>>>
>> Correct me if I'm wrong but I feel that we have now agreed on:
>>
>> 1. rename drupal to drupal6 in F15+
>>
>> 2. EL5 and EL6 get drupal6 (no change - this is already in testing)
>>
>>
Just getting to submitting reviews for these. I wanted to sanity-check
something, please tell me if this doesn't work.
We want to rename drupal to drupal6 in F15+. We have drupal6 already,
and it already has a devel branch due to the dist-git no-devel-branch
thingy. Should I not just dead.package drupal in master,
un-dead-package drupal6 in master, and have it there, and only there,
obsolete drupal == 6?
That works -- since it's a different package from what's currently in
drupal6 (more like the current drupal), you might want to put it up for
review anyhow... I think that is keeping with the spirit of FESCo's "you
need a rereview on renaming" policy even if taking the shortcut obeys the
letter of the policy.
-Toshio