On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 23:23, Runa Bhattacharjee
<runab(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
[top-posting to retain the quoted mail in entirety]
Thank you Toshio for the detailed information. This does provide some clarity
about the events in the background that eventually led to the decision. Since we
are already into the transition phase, further debate on the 'hows' and
'whys'
and 'so thats what it really was' would not serve much purpose besides adding to
the noise.
However, since we do expect to review the decision and explore the possibility
of returning to a Fedora hosted infrastructure, we may as well ensure that we do
not repeat the mistakes, especially that of communicating. As opposed to the
individuals from the FLP, the FLSCo, an elected group of representatives from
the FLP did not seem to figure anywhere during all this (unreported) discussion.
As a result, an established communication channel within the FLP was completely
ignored or not utilized.
I am not sure I know what/who the FLP, FLSCo, or such are. Could you
expand acronyms please? I guess my ignorance of them is to blame here
for making things not well communicated. There seem to be a plethora
of groups saying they needed to be consulted and I was only aware of 2
(L1ON and docs).
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren