On 12/09/2012 11:12 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Ian Malone
<ibmalone(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone <ibmalone(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki
>> this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything
>> would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
>>
>
> Made some updates to
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#Integrate_Jack_w...
>
> --
> imalone
>
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk
> _______________________________________________
> music mailing list
> music(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
I tried realTimeConfigQuickScan with the current spin ISO and there
were a couple of issues that it flagged. I'm not on that machine at
the moment but I can get back to it later tonight. Still, there does
not appear to be *any* CPU frequency / performance governor package in
either Fedora 17 or Fedora 18. You have to poke the values manually as
'root' into the /proc filesystem as far as I can tell. The same goes
for "swappiness", another parameter that realTimeConfigQuickScan
flagged on my machine.
I'll go ahead and file a documentation bug against
realTimeConfigQuickScan when I get back to my machine.
Its handled by cpupower now in Fedora. realTimeConfigQuickScan should be
easy enough to patch to detect its presence and display a message
regarding that I would have thought. I can look into it if you like.