On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:23:29PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 08/10/2009 07:34 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Paul W. Frields<stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:58AM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 14:34, David
>>>>
>>>> Yes they are, I think I passed SRPMs to Toshio already for inclusion
>>>> in infra's repos
>>>>
>>>> Here are the SRPMs
>>>>
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
>>>>
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.1-1.fc11.sr...
>>>
>
> So these are fedora-specific zikula modules. FAS auth and the
> fedora-theme are not likely to be used elsewhere, so they should
> likely live only in infra's internal repository, not EPEL.
> Toshio may be able to shed more light on the process for getting
> packages into infra's repo, but I believe I have already submitted the
> packages to him for inclusion.
Sorry, I forgot about this. I'm building them for the infrastructure
repo right now.
Do we want fasauth to go into Fedora itself? Will people be testing
zikula on their own machines? Would being able to easily install
fasauth help them do so? I'm not sure precisely how we're developing
our zikula installation so that might not be a concern here.
I *think* the answer is yes -- that we want people to be able to
effectively sandbox a Zikula locally to develop workflows that they
can then propose to a wider group.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug