Add Budgie Desktop as optional DE in Fedora Workstation

[Hugo Alejandro]

Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies keeping things simple.

It is now officially offers from the Solus project through OBS, but it would be good to
have in the official repositories of Fedora and perhaps in the future as Spin.

Cheers

[Bastián Díaz]

Duplicated mail here. I'm just a user, but it sounds like a very good
idea.

El 13-07-2016 17:10, haevalencia(a)gmail.com escribió: 

>  Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies
> keeping things simple.
>  
>  It is now officially offers from the Solus project through OBS, but it would be good to
> have in the official repositories of Fedora and perhaps in the future as Spin.
>  
>  Cheers
>  --
>  desktop mailing list
>  desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail] [1] 
 

Links:
------
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 21:10 +0000, haevalencia(a)gmail.com wrote:
>  Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies
>  keeping things simple.
>  
>  It is now officially offers from the Solus project through OBS, but
>  it would be good to have in the official repositories of Fedora and
>  perhaps in the future as Spin. 
Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion. I think it'd be great to get Budgie into
Fedora.

But this mailing list is for Fedora Workstation, which uses the GNOME
desktop, so you're not likely to get many replies on this list. You
might have more luck asking on devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org if anybody
is interested in packaging Budgie. Ultimately, it won't happen unless
somebody who's interested in Budgie steps up to do the work.

Michael

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 07:26:56PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>  On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 21:10 +0000, haevalencia(a)gmail.com wrote:
>  > Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies
>  > keeping things simple.
>  > 
>  > It is now officially offers from the Solus project through OBS, but
>  > it would be good to have in the official repositories of Fedora and
>  > perhaps in the future as Spin.
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  Thanks for your suggestion. I think it'd be great to get Budgie into
>  Fedora. 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875

Zbyszek

[Hugo Alejandro]

Hello, thank you very much for your guidance. I really thought as the short
description of the list is that talked about overall development of the
fedora desktop as a whole and not just Workstation (gnome).

Cheers

2016-07-13 20:26 GMT-04:00 Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro(a)gnome.org&gt;:

>  On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 21:10 +0000, haevalencia(a)gmail.com wrote:
>  > Budgie desktop is doing a very good job using GNOME technologies
>  > keeping things simple.
>  >
>  > It is now officially offers from the Solus project through OBS, but
>  > it would be good to have in the official repositories of Fedora and
>  > perhaps in the future as Spin.
>
>  Hi,
>
>  Thanks for your suggestion. I think it'd be great to get Budgie into
>  Fedora.
>
>  But this mailing list is for Fedora Workstation, which uses the GNOME
>  desktop, so you're not likely to get many replies on this list. You
>  might have more luck asking on devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org if anybody
>  is interested in packaging Budgie. Ultimately, it won't happen unless
>  somebody who's interested in Budgie steps up to do the work.
>
>  Michael
>  --
>  desktop mailing list
>  desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>

[Michael Catanzaro]

On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 22:18 -0300, Hugo Alejandro wrote:
>  Hello, thank you very much for your guidance. I really thought as
> the
>  short
>  description of the list is that talked about overall development of
>  the
>  fedora desktop as a whole and not just Workstation (gnome).
>  
>  Cheers 
Ah, the list description is "Discussions about development for the
Fedora desktop." Fedora desktop is an old code word for GNOME, but of
course there's no way you could have known that. We should edit the
list description to make this more clear.