this seems an appropriate topic for desktop-list...
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
this seems an appropriate topic for desktop-list...
I don't think there is much to discuss, though.
Yes, the missing abrt icon is a problem. But the fact that not every item in Places and System has an icon was our design decision, and is not a bug in any way.
I don't see how those 'missing' icons could even theoretically be considered a release blocker. They don't cause a problem in any way.
Matthias
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 16:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
this seems an appropriate topic for desktop-list...
I don't think there is much to discuss, though.
Yes, the missing abrt icon is a problem. But the fact that not every item in Places and System has an icon was our design decision, and is not a bug in any way.
I don't see how those 'missing' icons could even theoretically be considered a release blocker. They don't cause a problem in any way.
I dunno, I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my question was more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it.
Though looking at it again, it's a 'should' not a 'must' issue. Which by my understanding means it's not intended to actually be a blocker (only things on the release criteria page with the keyword 'must' indicate things we'd block for).
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I dunno, I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my question was more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it.
I was not involved in the creation of these criteria. It is obviously a bit unfortunate if design decisions like the one to drop some icons from the menus are not reflected in them.
As long as everybody is reasonable about this, it is not a big problem.
Matthias
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 07:37 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I dunno, I didn't write those criteria. I guess the idea was to have some kind of standard for final desktop polish. I guess my question was more or less what you answered above - whether this list knows why this is in the release criteria, and whether you'd agree with it.
I was not involved in the creation of these criteria. It is obviously a bit unfortunate if design decisions like the one to drop some icons from the menus are not reflected in them.
We'll be looking to refresh the release criteria in the near future. I'm not sure exactly when we'll kick that off, but we'll be sure to solicit feedback from all groups.
Thanks, James
desktop@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
James Laska -
Matthias Clasen