On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 11:08, Steven Garrity wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 12:24, Mariano Draghi wrote:
>
>>I believe it has to do with the fact that the "official" or
"standard"
>>MIME/type for the RPM extension is "Real Media" something.
>>So at some point it was decided to leave the .rpm files without
>>asociation (an asociation with "Install Packages" would be
non-standard,
>>and an asociation with Real Media Player would be a mistake in a
>>rpm-based distribution as FC2)
>
> That can't be right - we should be able to use sniffing anyhow, or at
> least associate the ".arch.rpm" extension if not plain ".rpm"
Should I file a bug on this?
Yeah, presumably vs. system-config-packages
Havoc