On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:07:19PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Is "feature parity with X11" the intended measure of
readiness here?
I thought there were specific X11 features that are intentionally not
going to be duplicated in Wayland, which would make that a false bar
to try to reach.
We've been kind of selling it as "it's ready when most people won't
notice". But I think we should nail down a precise bar. (Hmmm. Mixed
metaphor.)
Yeah — and that's a really great, useful thing. I'd _really_ love if
there were a "good enough!" criterion listed for each feature, agreed
on formally by the WG.
[...]
"Use the desktop normally, and verify that there are no
obvious
instabilities, or Wayland-specific bugs or performance problems"
"No Wayland-specific bugs" also doesn't appear to jibe with the desire
Maybe "No Wayland-specific bugs which would qualify as blockers on
their own", or something?
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader