Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On 4/21/10, William Jon McCann <william.jon.mccann(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We discussed this a bit on IRC yesterday but I wanted to bring it up
on the list too.
shouldn't this be on the 'users' list? does it not affect other users?
Now that we have rough consensus that we should try to limit the
volume of "pointless" updates, what is next?
we do? and what constitutes 'pointless'?
I propose we look at two things right away:
1. Limit the frequency of non-critical updates to once per week in
how is 'critical' defined? what is this 'stable release' ( as opposed
to 'release' )?
2. Establish norms or rules that limit the types of changes in
releases to ensure the releases remain stable
what steps would be taken to ensure that this 'stability' does not
interfere with 'incubate(ing) innovative new technologies'?
Thoughts? What is the best way to accomplish these two things?
Love is the law, love under will.