On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:07 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Yeah, if we want to ship one, gwibber is pretty much the only option,
> > since it's most likely too late to fix pino before F14 is released. The
> > big cons about gwibber, in my opinion is the fairly poor performance
> > I've experienced with it (tho I last used it about 2 months ago) and the
> > number of dependencies it would pull into the livecd.
>
> Doesn't post-Beta seem too late to do this? Better to have people
> simply use their browser I'd think.
well, we have to make *some* kind of post-beta change here, since as I
said the current situation blocks the release. I don't think subbing in
gwibber for pino is a particularly scary change, all we'd have to check
is if it goes over the size limit, and if it works, which is about half
an hour of effort.
Right, the uncertainty I have is really around the functionality of
the new suggested default client, as opposed to "let's not do
anything." My preference would be a simple removal of pino for no
other reason than least disturbance of the Force.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com