On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:38:11AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 09:45:50AM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>>2) The Design Suite is going to either (a) drop darktable (b) be dropped
>>itself (c) massively overhauled to become a Fedora Remix.
>>
>>3) Still don't understand the F23 experience of installing darktable.
>>
>>In terms of user experience, this simply sucks and makes me feel like
>>slavish adherence to obscure packaging rules is more important than our user
>>base.
>
On 09/10/2015 10:27 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>/me catches up with thread
>
>I'm not sure if 2(c) is necessary, if we have disabled repo support,
>but I don't understand how that works with the upgrade process. Need
>moar clue?
A lot of us use design-suite as a package group and not a live image. My
(perhaps flawed assumption) is that the disabled repo support wouldn't help
in this case as darktable couldn't be included in the package group being
from a different physical repo?
In the context of using design-suite as a package group... is there a way
forward without doing it as a remix in a separate repo from the main fedora
repos?
You're right -- the design-suite composition was not something I was
factoring in. Overtaken By Events now (see earlier update to list),
but thanks for raising good points.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com