Lennart Poettering (mzerqung(a)0pointer.de) said:
> Isn't this the sort of thing that should ship by default?
(Whether in a
> tuned profile or something else.)
The last time I discussed this with Matthew Garrett we came to the
conclusion that this isn't something we want for the general case. Best
is to ping him about this.
I am pretty sure that "tuned" is nothing we ever want to ship by
default. To "tune" something is the opposite of having good defaults. We
want good defaults, no tuning.
*shrug* In a multi-product universe, you need a mechansim for packaging and
applying said defaults, and doing it by patching systemd or the kernel seems
a less scalable solution than packaging the defaults separately. Whether
that's applied via tuned, or just packaging a sysctl file, can be discussed.
Bill