On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:38 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> - the logo would likely not be the stock distributor's one,
but one
> identifying the organization providing that leased/temporary service to
> the user. I can think of a number of reasons related to
> billing/support/accountability as of why this makes a lot more sense
> than in the "personal use" case.
... which, since many distributors of GNOME need to account for this case,
seems reasonable enough reason to have that space reserved in both the
login screen and any boot-time display (e.g. plymouth) already for a logo,
and for Fedora to put its logo there.
It sounds like we're going to have a logo in Fedora in any case, but
just for the sake of making my point clear, I really don't see why the
former (having that possibility available for specific use cases of some
users) would necessarily imply the latter (put a Fedora logo there for
all users).
Cosimo