On Wed 06 Mar 2013 11:10:44 AM EST, Bill Nottingham wrote:
drago01 (drago01(a)gmail.com) said:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 5 March 2013 20:02, Ryan Lerch <rlerch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Does this mean that the Application data will be something that Fedora will
>>> need to host in addition to the data already in the packages?
>>
>> Depends if Fedora wants to have application icons and translated
>> descriptions
>
> I still don't understand the whole fuzz about that .. it can't be that
> hard to ship a bunch of icons and text ...
Mainly that it becomes a pain in the ass to update, what do you do about
themed icons, and the logical silliness of a package that says:
License: GPL and LGPLv2 and LGPLv2+ and MPL and WTFPL and ASL2.0 and
GPLv3 and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3 and X11 and MIT and You'reAPepperToo
Bill
Also, wouldn't a single package that bundles a bunch of icons in it be
somewhere on the larger side, MB-wise?
cheers,
ryanlerch