Dan Williams (dcbw(a)redhat.com) said:
> Currently we ship the following localizations in OOo 2.0pre
that
> don't correspond to any glibc supported locale:
>
> - eo
> - kn-IN
> - ns
> - tn
> - zu
>
> Any reason to keep them?
Well, what's the equivalent locale in glibc?
Not sure; I'd presume they'd map to the same locale name, if they
existed in glibc. Note that the package description is generic enough
to not really tell you what the locale *is* that they support. :)
Bill