----- "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Since the FPL has appointed three of those seats to volunteers and
only one to someone who's a Red Hat employee, I'm not sure how this is
relevant. Looking at the Board history for those seats[1] one can see
half the appointments since mid-2008 have been volunteers. Also of
note is the fact that half the people elected by the community since
that time have also been volunteers. So the appointments don't look
slanted toward Red Hat employees AFAICT, which is just as intended.
We can agree to disagree on your overall point, that's fine. I just
wanted to point out the facts don't support an effort to stack the
Board with Red Hat people.
* * *
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/History
How about the bigger question, what percentage of FESCo has been Red Hat employees during
any term. After all it is FESCo that really matters what is in Fedora, not the board. I
would track this out myself but the use of non@redhat email addresses makes it hard, even
asking the candidates in Election town halls you get the run around commonly. "Who I
work for doesn't matter." How many times have we heard that?
-- Bob