On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jack Aboutboul <jaa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Where is the documentation on whats going on with this, if any? What
did we
decide to use?
The evaluation period was tracking on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CMS_solution_for_Fedora_Project_websites
(a page that probably needs updates)
The decision was zikula.
Infrastructure has provided a test system but it needs to be redone
with the fedora rpms
The modules need to be packaged.
The list of modules to package is is in this thread:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2009-May/msg00041.html
At least one is started:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091
There are a number of Docs Project members that want to learn to
package but all need help (probably with more than just packaging)
There may be a packaging class focusing on these modules at the FAD at
SELF (I wish I could go).
-Susan
Jack
David Nalley wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Ian Weller <ian(a)ianweller.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:17:29PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> CMS coming soon
>>>
>>
>> Speaking of which, what's the ETA on this?
>>
>
> Def. post-F-11
> I honestly haven't had the time I wish I could dedicate to getting all
> of the modules packaged.
> In addition, Toshio pointed out several problems which have required
> packaging some additional php modules.
>
> I'd argue we are 2 months away at our current rate - and I am probably
> forgetting about some critical path stuff that needs to happen.
>
--
Susan Lauber, (RHCX, RHCA, RHCSS)
Lauber System Solutions, Inc.
http://www.laubersolutions.com
gpg: 15AC F794 A3D9 64D1 D9CE 4C26 EFC3 11C2 BFA1 0974