tricky situation ....
who shall we vote? The people which have most written on the mailing -
The people which were most active at the weekly IRC meetings?
Or should we vote / nominate the people we met in real life and with
which we worked together?
If last there is always a reginal nomination on the other hand imho the
activst persons on the meetings and on the mailing lists must not be the
most activst persons als for fedora ...
I´m not really sure that the rewards is called as good as the idea
... and OK, I have at the moment also no better idea to find persons
which should be able to get such an award. BUT not alwas the loudest
people are the best :-)
Maybe the FAMSCO has to look which and what is gone in the past;
meetings, events etc. and hast to nominate himself and vote ...
Just my five cents
Am Dienstag, den 18.07.2006, 16:13 -0400 schrieb Alex Maier:
Nope, not really--please more nominations, we need more votes :)
On 7/18/06, Thomas Canniot <thomas.canniot(a)laposte.net> wrote:
> Le mardi 20 juin 2006 à 13:36 -0400, Alex Maier a écrit :
> > It has been over 3 months since our last round of Fedora Ambassadors
> > Recognition Awards.
> > The time has come again to recognize the leaders in our midst with a
> > little present and a big round of applause.
> > Please send your nominations to famsco-list(a)redhat.com.
> > To see our previous winners, please visit:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Awards
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> Has it been abandonned ?
> Thomas Canniot
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list