[famsco] Issue #440: Next elections: FAmSCo vs. Mindshare

[Robert Mayr]

robyduck reported a new issue against the project: `famsco` that you are following:
``
There is already a proposal to start with Mindshare for the next release cycle and it is
on the Council's table. However, as FAmSCo is indirectly involved in this topic, we
should give the Council an advice of how to proceed.
There are two options right now:

* Appoint and elect Mindshare members during next elections
* Wait another release cycle and ask for FAmSCo elections (there would be 4 seats open)

My thoughts are:
Mindshare will never be perfect to find a starting point, we need probably to dive into it
and then optimize the tasks/responsibilities/etc once they come up. This will take some
time, but it's the best solution to get it working right away.
FAmSCo has done some retooling and opened the communication as much as possible. There is
not much FAmSCo can do to move forward. 
That said, I would be in favor of starting with Mindshare now.

Can we collect your opinions and then suggest our decision to the Council? I think it will
be discussed by the Council next week, so we should have something ready before that
time.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/440

[Jona Azizaj]

jonatoni added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
As I said even during the meeting I'm +1 to start now with the Mindshare.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/440

[Robert Mayr]

robyduck added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I brought this up today and the Council approved the proposal.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/440

[Robert Mayr]

The status of the issue: `Next elections: FAmSCo vs. Mindshare` of project: `famsco` has
been updated to: Closed as Complete by robyduck.

https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/440