Am 30.10.2010 09:18, schrieb Marcus Moeller:
Dear Joerg,
>> Not such an inner-circle (and please note, I know what I am
>> talking about because in CentOS it's nearly the same)
>
> then why do you run for FAmSCo?
Because I want to establish as transparent processes as possible. (and
that's what I am working on in CentOS, too). In CentOS things also
look a bit different, e.g. to become a member of the QA team you have
to be 'invented' by the inner circle (which is the totally wrong
approach imho)
Where is the mentoring appointment process intransparent? Because FAmSCo
vote´s for new mentors - this is discussed and done in public? Or
because they have to work together with existing mentors - you can see
their work in the fama trac instance?
And there is nothing that put FAmSCo in a form of inner circle or
whatever you always talking about, transparence is something we strive
and also have improved during the last FAmSCo period - just read our
monthly Reports, where we show our work - or see our struggle in opening
the famsco-trac instance or that we opened the FAmSCo ML archives? Do
you know about the Ambassadors/FAmSCo processes well enough to claim
such things?
Once again the FAmSCo list archives are open - the FAmSCo meetings are
as well - and as already pointed out - a lot opportunities to bring your
points to the table - do you read the links i posted - where have you
been - during our stuggle to do the right thing with
membership/mentoring management - to put this in question now that we
established it and shaped it up?
cu Joerg
--
Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon(a)fedoraproject.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
http://kitall.blogspot.com
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688