On 10/16/2015 02:55 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
What do other folks think?
I think 30 days is a bit aggressive. There are also a number of articles
where a reply after even a year might be useful (e.g. - an article about
Technology Foo is high in Google Ranking and the piece is outdated and
better information lives elsewhere now, thus a commenter wants to ensure
other folks have some idea what is currently true).
No, I wouldn't expect a reply from an author a long time after a piece
is published - but that doesn't *necessarily* mean comments will no
longer have value.
Older pieces can be a major target for spam, so if this is something we
need to do in order to retain sanity from moderating spam, then I'd be
reluctantly +1.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/