Having already failed to get the weekly plan going, I'm up for the monthly plan.
There's a wiki page where we had started brainstorming--I'll try to find it.
Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:22:37PM +0200, Zoltan Hoppar wrote:
I think weekly basis is much better, as the next Fedora release is
not
earlier as 2013-11-26. So, having retrospective with inserts from
earlier conference pictures, and features made we together, and
running systems, FPLs.... I think let it be 10 week 10 interview with
inserts, documentary like - and visualization of as the code has
evolved. Gource vid as insert perhaps? Community size, registered
projects, number of features per release.... perhaps...
Well, that seems a bit much to 1) produce and 2) promote to me. However,
I won't stand in the way of others if they're going to do the work. I'll
commit to taking on some of a 12-month thing, but the prior results of a
weekly plan (dropped on floor) make me suspect that a weekly pace is a
bit much.
Any other thoughts? I'm happy to start creating Trac tickets for the
project and putting together a plan on the wiki... or content to let
someone else take lead on that and help where needed/where I can.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/
--
marketing mailing list
marketing(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing