----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
To: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet(a)lwn.net>
> I'd say forget about the name; it's one with some good
history and name
> recognition. Instead, rehabilitate it. Show the world that developers
> *do* care about whether Rawhide actually works and that they actually
> want to see bug reports. Then people might actually start coming back.
All of the above said, I'm cautiously open to this possibility, if if
there's agreement that we can make it work.
I'm +1 to this vs. finding a new name. Returning Rawhide to its "former
glory"
is much more interesting than picking a new name and trying to explain that
to users and all the work that goes with that. (Both are going to be work,
but I prefer the work of "let's fix Rawhide and tell that story to the
world,"
over "let's fix Rawhide and rename it."
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/